ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2024
Analysis of cyclic fatigue resistance of different endodontic nickel-titanium rotary instruments: An
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of bending test, cyclic fatigue, and buckling resistance test using rotary Nickel-Titanium files of three types: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Mechanical and elemental comparison of EndoStar and One Curve nickel-titanium endodontic files: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- A nationwide cross-sectional study on endodontic instrument fractures and development of a comprehensive classification system.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Analysis of dynamic cyclic fatigue resistance of different endodontic nickel-titanium instruments with different sterilization methods: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The aim of this Materials and Methods: Ten files each of ProTaper Gold (PG), Hyflex Electro-discharge Machining (HEDM), and TruNatomy (TN) were tested in a custom-fabricated dynamic cyclic fatigue testing device at 60° curvature having a radius of curvature of 5 mm. The number of cycles to the fracture (NCF) of each instrument was calculated and three continuous groups were compared by the Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn Results: Cyclic fatigue resistance of HEDM was the highest, followed by TN. PG had the lowest among the three. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.