Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38389712›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Ultra-processed food consumption and risk of cardiovascular events: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.

Yang Qu, Wei Hu, Jing Huang, Bijun Tan, Fenghui Ma, Changyang Xing, Lijun Yuan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yang QuDepartment of Ultrasound Diagnostics, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710038, China.
Wei HuDepartment of Ultrasound Diagnostics, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710038, China.
Jing HuangDepartment of Health Management, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710038, China.
Bijun TanDepartment of Ultrasound Diagnostics, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710038, China.
Fenghui MaDepartment of Health Management, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710038, China.
Changyang XingDepartment of Ultrasound Diagnostics, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710038, China.
Lijun YuanDepartment of Ultrasound Diagnostics, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710038, China.
Air Force Medical University · CNXi'an Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption continues to increase worldwide. However, evidences from meta-analyses are limited regarding the effects on cardiovascular events (CVEs). Methods: A meta-analysis was performed to assess the dose-response relationship of UPF consumption and CVEs risk (including the morbidity and mortality of cardiovascular causes, and myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, coronary intervention). Databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched for observational studies published in English language up to October 24, 2023. Generalized least squares regression and restricted cubic splines were used to estimate the linear/nonlinear relationship. PROSPERO CRD 42023391122. Findings: Twenty studies with 1,101,073 participants and 58,201 CVEs cases with a median follow-up of 12.2 years were included. A positive linear relationship between UPF intake and CVEs risk was identified. In addition, positive correlation between coronary heart disease and UPF consumption in terms of daily serving and daily energy proportion. No significant association of UPF consumption with the risk of cerebrovascular disease was observed. Briefly, 10% increase of UPF by daily weight proportion was associated with a 1.9% increase of CVEs risk (RR = 1.019; 95% CI, 1.007-1.031; Interpretation: UPF consumption were associated with a higher risk of CVEs in the positive linear relationship. Our findings highlight the importance of minimizing UPF consumption for cardiovascular health and might be help to pursue public health policies in control of UPF consumption. Funding: This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province (2023-ZDLSF-22), the Innovative Talent Support Program of Shaanxi Province (2022KJXX-106), and the Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province (2023-YBSF-424).

Indexed as

Cardiovascular eventsCoronary heart diseaseDose–responseMeta-analysisRiskUltra-processed food

Identifiers

PMID38389712
PMCPMC10882111
OpenAlexW4391873360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.