Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38389651›Full record

ArticleJPRAS open2024

Predesigned chimeric deep inferior epigastric perforator and inguinal lymph node flap for combined breast and lymphedema reconstruction: A comprehensive algorithmic approach.

Efterpi Demiri, Dimitrios Dionyssiou, Ioannis Kyriazidis, Avra Drougou, Antonios Tsimponis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPRAS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pushing the DIEP Envelope: Where Are We Now?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Efterpi DemiriDepartment of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Papageorgiou Hospital, Thessaloniki Greece.
Dimitrios DionyssiouDepartment of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Papageorgiou Hospital, Thessaloniki Greece.
Ioannis KyriazidisDepartment of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Papageorgiou Hospital, Thessaloniki Greece.
Avra DrougouDepartment of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Papageorgiou Hospital, Thessaloniki Greece.
Antonios TsimponisDepartment of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Papageorgiou Hospital, Thessaloniki Greece.
Papageorgiou General Hospital · GRInterbalkan Medical Center · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combined use of a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap coupled with vascularized inguinal lymph nodes (VILNs) for simultaneous breast and lymphedema reconstruction has already been well established, and promising results have been reported. However, a standardized approach for the planning and shaping of this combined flap is still lacking. We aimed to propose a comprehensive algorithmic approach for delayed unilateral breast and lymphedema reconstruction using a predesigned abdominal flap associated with inguinal lymph node transfer. We present in detail the preoperative measurements and surgical technique of the chimeric flap, which combines a predesigned DIEP template and a preselected inguinal lymph node flap, based on the preoperative computed tomography angiography and SPEC-CT findings, respectively; four different flap types are described according to the location of the pedicles of the two flap components. Our results of a series of 34 consecutive female patients with unilateral mastectomy and arm lymphedema, who underwent this combined predesigned reconstructive procedure, are retrospectively analyzed and reported. We recorded a high survival rate of the chimeric flaps in our series, with only one case of partial ischemic loss of a DIEP skin island. In the majority of our patients, the pedicles of the combined flaps were located in opposite positions. After a mean 35-month follow-up, we recorded a 47% mean volume difference reduction of the lymphedematous compared to the unaffected arm; no donor-site lymphedema was documented. Self-evaluation questionnaires showed high patient satisfaction rates regarding breast reconstruction. This algorithmic approach provides standardized guidance for accurate design and transfer of the DIEP-VILN chimeric flap while achieving highly satisfactory outcomes for both breast and lymphedema reconstruction.

Indexed as

Breast cancer–related lymphedemaChimeric flapCombined breast-lymphedema reconstructionRedesigned DIEP flapVascularized inguinal lymph node transfer

Identifiers

PMID38389651
PMCPMC10879689
OpenAlexW4391234330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.