ArticleCureus2024
Impact of Diabetic Foot Ulcer on the Health-Related Quality of Life of Diabetic Patients in Khartoum State.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The role of vitamin D in diabetic foot ulcer; an umbrella review of meta-analyses.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Toe Amputation Among Sudanese Diabetic Patients in Jabir Abu-Eliz Diabetic Centre at Khartoum, 2021: A Cross Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Gender-Based Disparities in Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Type-II Diabetes Patients in Punjab, India: Insights for Tailored Interventions.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Article
- Unravelling the pathophysiology of diabetic foot ulcer: insights into a complex wound healing process.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2026Review
- Patient-Reported Experience (PREMs) and Outcome (PROMs) Measures in Diabetic Foot Disease Management-A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background This is a novel study from Sudan aimed at comparing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) patients and diabetes patients without DFU. Additionally, this study aimed to determine the factors correlating with lower HRQoL. Methodology A descriptive, cross-sectional study with a comparative group was conducted in three diabetes centers in Khartoum, Sudan, in 2020. A total of 120 Sudanese diabetic patients (mean age = 52 years) were divided into two groups, without DFU and with DFU, and interviewed in person. Demographic and clinical variables were recorded. HRQoL was evaluated using the standardized RAND-36 (36-Item Short Form Health Survey) survey for all participants. HRQoL domains and total scores were compared in the two groups using the t-test. Inference against sociodemographic data was determined using Pearson's test and analysis of variance. Results The DFU group (36 males, 24 females) scored significantly lower in five (yet higher in two out of the eight subscales) compared to the non-DFU diabetic group (31 males, 29 females). Energy/fatigue levels remained insignificant. Being a female (p = 0.03), painful ulcers (p = 0.001), insulin use (p = 0.04), and newly developed ulcers (p = 0.005) were associated with lower HRQoL total scores in the DFU group. However, educational levels had a positive correlation (p = 0.02). Conclusions DFU patients have lower HRQoL than diabetic patients without ulcers. They need more support, including disease-specific education, realistic expectations (regarding ulcer's impact, healing, and management), physical rehabilitation, and culturally sensitive assessment tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.