ReviewCureus2024
Unveiling the Diagnostic Potential: A Comprehensive Review of Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Interstitial Lung Disease.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis: from pathophysiological window to a precision diagnostic tool.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- PW-BALFC, a clinical dataset for detection and instance segmentation of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cell.Scientific data · 2025Article
- KL‑6, ET‑1 and S100A9 levels in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and obstructive sleep apnea.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This comprehensive review examines the diagnostic potential of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in interstitial lung disease (ILD), emphasizing its accuracy and significance in various ILDs, including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), sarcoidosis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and connective tissue disease-associated ILD. The analysis underscores the importance of abnormalities in both cellular and non-cellular components of BAL fluid for precise ILD diagnosis. Recommendations advocate for the integration of BAL into clinical guidelines, a multidisciplinary diagnostic approach, and further standardization of procedures. Looking toward the future, ongoing research highlights technological advancements, biomarker discovery, and the integration of artificial intelligence in BAL interpretation. These developments not only promise to enhance ILD diagnosis but also offer prospects for a more personalized approach to patient management based on insightful patient stratification guided by BAL findings. This abstract encapsulates the key findings, recommendations, and future prospects identified in the review, providing a concise overview of the diagnostic potential of BAL in ILD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.