ArticleCureus2024
Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Narrow Mandibular Ridge by Two-Stage Split Technique: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subsequent to dental extraction, residual ridge resorption manifests as an inherent biological process unfolding over an approximate duration of one year. This intrinsic phenomenon entails a substantial diminution, occasionally reaching 50%, in the initial bucco-lingual dimensions of the mandibular bone. To address this issue, a dental procedure known as the two-stage ridge split intervention is employed. This process involves two distinct stages: ridge splitting and extension. In the first stage, the dentist splits the alveolar crest to create a widening gap. This allows for the subsequent placement of dental implants. The splitting process is carefully executed to ensure that there's enough space for the implants to be securely embedded, and in the second stage, the widened gap generated through the split and extension of the alveolar crest is replenished with a suitable material. Two common options are hydroxyapatite, a synthetic bone-like substance that promotes bone regeneration, or autogenous bone grafts, which are harvested from the patient's bone, often from another site within the mouth. Following this two-stage procedure, the next step is to place dental implants. However, there's typically a waiting period of eight to 12 weeks. This interval allows for proper healing and integration of the grafted or filled material with the existing bone before the implants are installed. In this case report, a specific patient's experience with the two-stage ridge split procedure in the mandibular region is mentioned. Such case studies are valuable in assessing the success and viability of this dental intervention in narrow mandibular-width cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.