ArticleFoot & ankle international2024
Joint-Preserving Osteotomy of the Lateral Tibial Plafond for Posttraumatic Osteonecrosis: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Foot & ankle international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPosttraumatic osteonecrosis (ON) of the lateral distal tibia is a rare but severe complication of malleolar fractures. Treatment options include ankle fusion, arthroplasty, osteotomy, and drilling but clinical data on outcomes are limited to single case reports. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the outcome following joint-preserving reconstruction.
methodsOver a 10-year period, 10 patients (8 females and 2 males, average age 36 years; range, 27-68 years) with posttraumatic ON were treated with intra-articular osteotomy of the distal tibia and bone grafting. All patients initially sustained a closed pronation injury, 7 with initial tibiotalar subluxation. Chronic syndesmotic instability following initial treatment was present in 4 patients and 5 were smokers. All patients were followed for a median of 68 (range, 12-103) months, 7 returned in person for clinical and radiographic follow-up.
resultsNo immediate postoperative complications were seen. Secondary ankle fusion was necessary in 1 case (10%) because of progressive osteoarthritis. At the time of follow-up, anterior ankle arthritis leading to impingement and requiring cheilectomy was noted in 4 cases, partial graft necrosis, and secondary syndesmotic instability requiring revision surgery was seen in 1 case each. Compared with the preoperative values, significant improvement in the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (
conclusionIn our limited series of patients with posttraumatic ON of the lateral distal tibia, we found that joint-preserving reconstruction using an intra-articular distal tibial osteotomy with autologous bone grafting usually provided significant functional improvement and pain relief. In our cohort secondary fusions by a median 5.5-year follow-up were rare, but secondary, joint-sparing surgeries were common. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prospective study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.