ReviewActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2024
Practical approaches for supporting informed consent in neonatal clinical trials.
Review in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Midline Head Position for Preterm Infants in the First 72 h: A Pilot Randomised Control Trial.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2025Trial
- Parent perspectives on neonatal research without prior consent: a mixed-methods interview study.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Informed consent, randomization, and blinding in neonatal resuscitation and immediate care trials.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Pharmacological Therapies for Consequences of Perinatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury: Where Are We Now?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Informed consent: Navigating the bioethical complexities of clinical research.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The survival and health of preterm and critically ill infants have markedly improved over the past 50 years, supported by well-conducted neonatal research. However, newborn research is difficult to undertake for many reasons, and obtaining informed consent for research in this population presents several unique ethical and logistical challenges. In this article, we explore methods to facilitate the consent process, including the role of checklists to support meaningful informed consent for neonatal clinical trials.
conclusionThe authors provide practical guidance on the design and implementation of an effective consent checklist tailored for use in neonatal clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.