Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38389083›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2024

Sero-epidemiological investigation on Toxoplasma gondii infection in Apennine wolf (Canis lupus italicus) and wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Italy.

Filippo Maria Dini, Carmela Musto, Vincenzo Maria De Nigris, Enrica Bellinello, Maria Sampieri, Giuseppe Merialdi, Lorella Barca, Mauro Delogu, Roberta Galuppi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Multiple Typing Approach to CharacterizeAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  4. Sentinels in the shadows: ExploringInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Article
  5. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Filippo Maria DiniDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Ozzano Emilia, Bologna, 40064, Italy. filippomaria.dini@unibo.it.
Carmela MustoDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Ozzano Emilia, Bologna, 40064, Italy.
Vincenzo Maria De NigrisAUSL Bologna dipartimento di Sanità Pubblica Veterinaria- UO Veterinaria B, Via del Seminario, 1 San Lazzaro di Savena, Bologna, Italy.
Enrica BellinelloAUSL Modena, dipartimento di Sanità Pubblica Veterinaria, via Suore di San Giuseppe Benedetto Cottolengo, 5 41026 Pavullo nel Frignano, Modena, Italy.
Maria SampieriIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna Bruno Ubertini, Brescia, Italy.
Giuseppe MerialdiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna Bruno Ubertini, Brescia, Italy.
Lorella BarcaIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Portici, Napoli, Italy.
Mauro DeloguDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Ozzano Emilia, Bologna, 40064, Italy.
Roberta GaluppiDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Ozzano Emilia, Bologna, 40064, Italy.
University of Bologna · ITIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna "Bruno Ubertini" · ITAzienda Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di Modena · ITAzienda USL di Bologna · ITIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno · IT

Funding

Vienna Science and Technology Fund (WWTF) [10.47379/ESR20009] 10.47379/ESR20009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe wild boar (Sus scrofa) and the Apennine wolf (Canis lupus italicus) are two wild species that have both increased their presence in the Italian territory, albeit in varying numbers. They can be occasionally found in peri-urban areas as well. Both of these species can serve as intermediate hosts for Toxoplasma gondii, as they can become infected either through the consumption of oocysts found in water, soil, or on vegetables, or through the ingestion of meat containing bradyzoites. Consequently, these animals can be regarded as key indicators of Toxoplasma presence in the wild or peri-urban environment. In our study, we examined a total of 174 wild boar meat juice and 128 wolf sera from Italy for the detection of T. gondii IgG using the indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT).

resultsThe results showed that 40 (22.6%) of the wild boar meat juice and 34 (26.6%) of the wolf serum samples tested positive. Interestingly, there were no significant differences in seropositivity with respect to gender, age group, or the region of origin in both species.

conclusionsOverall the results indicate a moderate exposure in both the species under investigation, highlighting the spread of T. gondii in sylvatic and periurban environments. The prevalence of T. gondii in wild boar is consistent with findings from other studies conducted in Europe. Our study, with a considerably larger sample size compared to the available research in European context, provides valuable data on the seroprevalence of T. gondii in wolves.

Indexed as

Swine DiseasesToxoplasmaToxoplasmosis, AnimalWolvesAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanItalySeroepidemiologic StudiesSus scrofaSwineAntibodies, ProtozoanEpidemiologyIFATSerologyToxoplasmosisWildlife

Identifiers

PMID38389083
PMCPMC10882895
OpenAlexW4392050672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.