Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38388937›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical education2024

Comparing the effects of team-based and problem-based learning strategies in medical education: a systematic review.

Weilin Zhang, Jinsong Wei, Weixiong Guo, Zhongwei Wang, Siyuan Chen

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparison of progress test performance between PBL and TBL curricula.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Adapting to Gen Z: Innovative educational strategies in medical education.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Weilin Zhang *Department of orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, PR China.
Jinsong Wei *Department of orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, PR China.
Weixiong GuoDepartment of orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, PR China.
Zhongwei WangDepartment of orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, PR China.
Siyuan ChenDepartment of orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, PR China. Siyuan.chen@gdmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2021A1515010975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, there has been a concerted effort within medical schools to depart from conventional lecture-based learning approaches to alternative teaching methods such as team-based learning (TBL) and problem-based learning (PBL), with the aim of enhancing both student engagement and instructional efficacy. Despite this shift, a comprehensive review that directly compares the impacts of PBL and TBL methods in medical education is lacking. This study seeks to address this gap by conducting a meta-analysis that compares the effects of TBL and PBL in the context of medical education.

methodsStudies from Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Chinese Wanfang Database were searched, from inception to July 11, 2023. A meta-analysis was performed using Stata 14.0, and a total of 10 studies (including 752 participants) were included. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to estimate pooled effects. Heterogeneity was detected using the I2 statistic and further explored using meta-regression analysis.

resultsCompared with PBL, TBL significantly increased the number of theoretical tests (SMD = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.02-0.73). Additionally, TBL greatly improved teamwork skills compared with PBL. However, there were no significant differences between the TBL and PBL groups concerning practical skill scores, learning interest, or understanding skills.

conclusionTBL in the theoretical aspects of medical education appears to be more effective than PBL in improving theoretical test scores and teamwork skills, providing evidence for the implementation of TBL in medical education.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalProblem-Based LearningEducational MeasurementGroup ProcessesHumansStudents, MedicalMedical educationProblem-based learningTeam-based learning

Identifiers

PMID38388937
PMCPMC10885648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.