Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38388895›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2024

Rehabilitation activities with tablet (REACT) in Parkinson's disease.

Paola Antoniotti, Verena Biscaro, Francesca Mancini, Massimo Caprino, Peppino Tropea, Massimo Corbo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paola AntoniottiDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa Di Cura Igea, Via Dezza, 48, 20144, Milan, Italy. p.antoniotti@casadicuraigea.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0369-7689
Verena BiscaroFondazione Need Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1454-7173
Francesca ManciniFondazione Need Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4246-173X
Massimo CaprinoDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa Di Cura Igea, Via Dezza, 48, 20144, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6966-6770
Peppino TropeaDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa Di Cura Igea, Via Dezza, 48, 20144, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8238-9619
Massimo CorboDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa Di Cura Igea, Via Dezza, 48, 20144, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0793-9830
Casa di Cura Columbus · ITOspedale San Carlo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is evidence to demonstrate that plasticity is "use-dependent" and that intensive practice may be necessary to modify neural organization. PURPOSE: The main aim of this work is to investigate the REACT usability, an innovative app, to assist People with Parkinson Disease (PwPD) at home.

methodsA pilot study has been conducted enrolling 20 consecutive PwPD. Before home rehabilitation activities started, each patient received training on the REACT app and how to use the device and the services in daily practice. Motor and cognitive evaluations were administered to assign personalized exercises, tailored to patients' needs and potential. PwPD carried out REACT home program for 1 month, four times a week. The app included motor exercise and tutorial of activities of daily living (ADL) and functional cognitive stimulation. REACT-app usability was evaluated with the System Usability Scale (SUS).

resultsThe results from SUS questionnaire were, on average, above the threshold of "good usability" (SUS score > 68), as reported in the literature. The 47% of PwPD that used the app rated the usability of the solution as "excellent." Almost all SUS items reached the reference benchmark (except items 4, 5, and 7). No adverse events occurred.

conclusionsREACT can be considered a useful and safe tool to support the continuity of care and treatment at home, in PwPD. Larger-scale trials are needed to validate the good acceptance and efficacy of home rehabilitation through technology applications.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingComputers, HandheldMobile ApplicationsParkinson DiseaseAgedExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsE-medicalHome-rehabilitationParkinson’s diseaseTabletTele-rehabilitationUsability

Identifiers

PMID38388895
OpenAlexW4392773715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.