ArticleEye (London, England)2024
Robotic assisted orbital surgery for resection of advanced periocular tumours - a case series report on the feasibility, safety and outcome.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent advances: Augmented reality, robotics, and navigation in oculoplasty and orbit.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Comparative evaluation of robotic surgical systems in oculoplastic surgery: A study of Da Vinci versus medtronic hugo RAS in standardized eyelid incisions.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Outcomes of malignant orbital tumors: a 22-year Norwegian single-center series.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Role of Computer-Assisted Surgery in the Management of Pediatric Orbital Tumors: Insights from a Leading Referral Center.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- Use of Robotic Surgery for the Management of Orbital Diseases: A Comprehensive Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOrbital surgery benefits from well-designed instrumentation that offers gentle tissue manipulation, high manoeuvrability and control. Nevertheless, in confined spaces, tissue manipulation must be accomplished with exceptionally high accuracy and precision. This is where robotic surgery offers an advantage. We aimed to evaluate a robotic-assisted surgical system's feasibility, safety and outcome in assisting tumour clearance. PATIENTS AND
methodsA case series of patients with advanced periocular tumours undergoing robotic-assisted globe-sparing resection was performed using the DaVinci XI system (Intuitive Surgical, Inc). Institutional ethics and multidisciplinary approval were sought in all cases.
resultsFour patients with advanced periocular tumours underwent robotic-assisted orbital surgery at a mean age of 63 years (range 42-86). Two patients were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma, and two had basal cell carcinoma. One patient was found to have positive lymph nodes at the time of surgery and underwent simultaneous parotidectomy and lymph node clearance. Clear resection of the primary tumour was achieved in all patients; three patients underwent further resection due to narrow margins prior to reconstruction. Patients were follow-up for at least one year, and three remained disease-free. One patient with pre-existing extra-orbital disease developed metastatic disease four months post-op. All patients preserved vision peri-operatively, with no complaints of diplopia. Moderate ocular surface disease was noted in two patients.
conclusionOur series highlights the potential advantage of three-dimensional optics, multi-directional instrumentation and motion scaling technology to achieve globe-sparing tumour resection in advanced periocular tumours. However, further robotic instrumentation development is required for orbital surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.