Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38388719›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Deep learning for automatic bowel-obstruction identification on abdominal CT.

Quentin Vanderbecq, Maxence Gelard, Jean-Christophe Pesquet, Mathilde Wagner, Lionel Arrive, Marc Zins, Emilie Chouzenoux

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Quentin VanderbecqDepartment of Radiology, AP-HP.Sorbonne, Saint Antoine Hospital, 184 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012, Paris, France. q.vanderbecq@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8024-3445
Maxence GelardUniversité Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, Gif-sur-Yvette, Inria, CVN, France.
Jean-Christophe PesquetUniversité Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, Gif-sur-Yvette, Inria, CVN, France.
Mathilde WagnerUMR 7371, Université Sorbonne, CNRS, Inserm U114615, rue de l'École de Médecine, 75006, Paris, France.
Lionel ArriveDepartment of Radiology, AP-HP.Sorbonne, Saint Antoine Hospital, 184 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012, Paris, France.
Marc ZinsDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Paris Saint-Joseph, 185 Rue Raymond Losserand, 75014, Paris, Île-de-France, France.
Emilie ChouzenouxUniversité Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, Gif-sur-Yvette, Inria, CVN, France.
Université Paris-Saclay · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHôpital Paris Saint-Joseph · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE AND

objectivesAutomated evaluation of abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans should help radiologists manage their massive workloads, thereby leading to earlier diagnoses and better patient outcomes. Our objective was to develop a machine-learning model capable of reliably identifying suspected bowel obstruction (BO) on abdominal CT. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe internal dataset comprised 1345 abdominal CTs obtained in 2015-2022 from 1273 patients with suspected BO; among them, 670 were annotated as BO yes/no by an experienced abdominal radiologist. The external dataset consisted of 88 radiologist-annotated CTs. We developed a full preprocessing pipeline for abdominal CT comprising a model to locate the abdominal-pelvic region and another model to crop the 3D scan around the body. We built, trained, and tested several neural-network architectures for the binary classification (BO, yes/no) of each CT. F1 and balanced accuracy scores were computed to assess model performance.

resultsThe mixed convolutional network pretrained on a Kinetics 400 dataset achieved the best results: with the internal dataset, the F1 score was 0.92, balanced accuracy 0.86, and sensitivity 0.93; with the external dataset, the corresponding values were 0.89, 0.89, and 0.89. When calibrated on sensitivity, this model produced 1.00 sensitivity, 0.84 specificity, and an F1 score of 0.88 with the internal dataset; corresponding values were 0.98, 0.76, and 0.87 with the external dataset.

conclusionThe 3D mixed convolutional neural network developed here shows great potential for the automated binary classification (BO yes/no) of abdominal CT scans from patients with suspected BO. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The 3D mixed CNN automates bowel obstruction classification, potentially automating patient selection and CT prioritization, leading to an enhanced radiologist workflow. KEY POINTS: • Bowel obstruction's rising incidence strains radiologists. AI can aid urgent CT readings. • Employed 1345 CT scans, neural networks for bowel obstruction detection, achieving high accuracy and sensitivity on external testing. • 3D mixed CNN automates CT reading prioritization effectively and speeds up bowel obstruction diagnosis.

Indexed as

Deep LearningIntestinal ObstructionRadiography, AbdominalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSensitivity and SpecificityAbdomenComputed tomographyIntestinesNeural networksObstruction

Identifiers

PMID38388719
OpenAlexW4391245749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.