Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38388708›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Insights into attention and memory difficulties in post-COVID syndrome using standardized neuropsychological tests and experimental cognitive tasks.

Sandra Arbula, Elisabetta Pisanu, Giulia Bellavita, Alina Menichelli, Alberta Lunardelli, Giovanni Furlanis, Paolo Manganotti, Stefano Cappa, Raffaella Rumiati

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Toward characterizing brain fog in long COVID: correlates and impact on measurement metrics.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra ArbulaNeuroscience Area, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Via Bonomea 265, 34136, Trieste, Italy. saarbul@sissa.it.ORCID 0000-0002-7915-2140
Elisabetta PisanuNeuroscience Area, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Via Bonomea 265, 34136, Trieste, Italy.
Giulia BellavitaNeurology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Trieste University Hospital ASUGI, Trieste, Italy.
Alina MenichelliRehabilitation Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Trieste University Hospital ASUGI, Trieste, Italy.
Alberta LunardelliRehabilitation Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Trieste University Hospital ASUGI, Trieste, Italy.
Giovanni FurlanisNeurology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Trieste University Hospital ASUGI, Trieste, Italy.
Paolo ManganottiNeurology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Trieste University Hospital ASUGI, Trieste, Italy.
Stefano CappaScuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS, Pavia, Italy.
Raffaella RumiatiNeuroscience Area, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Via Bonomea 265, 34136, Trieste, Italy.
University of Trieste · ITScuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati · ITIstituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has given rise to post-acute cognitive symptoms, often described as 'brain fog'. To comprehensively grasp the extent of these issues, we conducted a study integrating traditional neuropsychological assessments with experimental cognitive tasks targeting attention control, working memory, and long-term memory, three cognitive domains most commonly associated with 'brain fog'. We enrolled 33 post-COVID patients, all self-reporting cognitive difficulties, and a matched control group (N = 27) for cognitive and psychological assessments. Our findings revealed significant attention deficits in post-COVID patients across both neuropsychological measurements and experimental cognitive tasks, evidencing reduced performance in tasks involving interference resolution and selective and sustained attention. Mild executive function and naming impairments also emerged from the neuropsychological assessment. Notably, 61% of patients reported significant prospective memory failures in daily life, aligning with our recruitment focus. Furthermore, our patient group showed significant alterations in the psycho-affective domain, indicating a complex interplay between cognitive and psychological factors, which could point to a non-cognitive determinant of subjectively experienced cognitive changes following COVID-19. In summary, our study offers valuable insights into attention challenges faced by individuals recovering from COVID-19, stressing the importance of comprehensive cognitive and psycho-affective evaluations for supporting post-COVID individuals.

Indexed as

Cognition DisordersCognitive DysfunctionCOVID-19CognitionHumansNeuropsychological TestsPandemicsSyndrome

Identifiers

PMID38388708
PMCPMC10883994
OpenAlexW4392086117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.