ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2024
Delayed Enhancement of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Plaque Can Better Differentiate Culprit Lesions: A Multiphase Contrast-Enhanced Vessel Wall MRI Study.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expert consensus on intracranial vessel wall MRI in cerebrovascular disease: Society for Magnetic Resonance Angiography recommendations.European radiology · 2026Review
- Voxel-Wise Quantification and Multi-planar Visualization of Plaque Contrast Enhancement in Intracranial Vessel Wall MRI.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Inter-rater reliability of atherosclerotic plaque enhancement on 7 T vessel wall MRI: Comparison with quantitative analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeIntracranial plaque enhancement (IPE) identified by contrast-enhanced vessel wall MR imaging (VW-MR imaging) is an emerging marker of plaque instability related to stroke risk, but there was no standardized timing for postcontrast acquisition. We aim to explore the optimal postcontrast timing by using multiphase contrast-enhanced VW-MR imaging and to test its performance in differentiating culprit and nonculprit lesions. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients with acute ischemic stroke due to intracranial plaque were prospectively recruited to undergo VW-MR imaging with 1 precontrast phase and 4 consecutive postcontrast phases (9 minutes and 13 seconds for each phase). The signal intensity (SI) values of the CSF and intracranial plaque were measured on 1 precontrast and 4 postcontrast phases to determine the intracranial plaque enhancement index (PEI). The dynamic changes of the PEI were compared between culprit and nonculprit plaques on the postcontrast acquisitions.
resultsThirty patients with acute stroke (aged 59 ± 10 years, 18 [60%] men) with 113 intracranial plaques were included. The average PEI of all intracranial plaques significantly increased (up to 14%) over the 4 phases. There was significantly increased PEI over the 4 phases for culprit plaques (an average increase of 23%), but this was not observed for nonculprit plaques. For differentiating culprit and nonculprit plaques, we observed that the performance of IPE in the second postcontrast phase (cutoff = 0.83, AUC = 0.829 [0.746-0.893]) exhibited superior accuracy when compared with PEI in the first postcontrast phase (cutoff = 0.48; AUC = 0.768 [0.680-0.843]) (
conclusionsA 9-minute delay of postcontrast acquisition can maximize plaque enhancement and better differentiate between culprit and nonculprit plaques. In addition, culprit and nonculprit plaques have different enhancement temporal patterns, which should be evaluated in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.