ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
A comprehensive computational benchmark for evaluating deep learning-based protein function prediction approaches.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genolator enables protein function interpretation using a multimodal large language model fusing genomic and structural interpretation with natural language interaction.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Powers Protein Functional Annotation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Evaluating network-based algorithms for protein function prediction using plant protein-protein interaction networks.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Predictive AI in Clinical Pharmacology: A Call to Action to Develop Robust Benchmarking Practices.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
- Isolation ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- DPFunc: accurately predicting protein function via deep learning with domain-guided structure information.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Deep learning model for protein multi-label subcellular localization and function prediction based on multi-task collaborative training.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Proteins play an important role in life activities and are the basic units for performing functions. Accurately annotating functions to proteins is crucial for understanding the intricate mechanisms of life and developing effective treatments for complex diseases. Traditional biological experiments struggle to keep pace with the growing number of known proteins. With the development of high-throughput sequencing technology, a wide variety of biological data provides the possibility to accurately predict protein functions by computational methods. Consequently, many computational methods have been proposed. Due to the diversity of application scenarios, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of these computational methods to determine the suitability of each algorithm for specific cases. In this study, we present a comprehensive benchmark, BeProf, to process data and evaluate representative computational methods. We first collect the latest datasets and analyze the data characteristics. Then, we investigate and summarize 17 state-of-the-art computational methods. Finally, we propose a novel comprehensive evaluation metric, design eight application scenarios and evaluate the performance of existing methods on these scenarios. Based on the evaluation, we provide practical recommendations for different scenarios, enabling users to select the most suitable method for their specific needs. All of these servers can be obtained from https://csuligroup.com/BEPROF and https://github.com/CSUBioGroup/BEPROF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.