Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38388679›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Biomolecular evidence for changing millet reliance in Late Bronze Age central Germany.

Eleftheria Orfanou, Barbara Zach, Adam B Rohrlach, Florian N Schneider, Enrico Paust, Mary Lucas, Taylor Hermes, Jana Ilgner, Erin Scott, Peter Ettel and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Eleftheria OrfanouDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. eleftheria_orfanou@eva.mpg.de.
Barbara ZachDepartment of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Adam B RohrlachDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Florian N SchneiderChair of Pre- and Protohistoric Archaeology, Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Enrico PaustChair of Pre- and Protohistoric Archaeology, Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Mary LucasDepartment of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Taylor HermesDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Jana IlgnerDepartment of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Erin ScottDepartment of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Peter EttelChair of Pre- and Protohistoric Archaeology, Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Wolfgang HaakDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Robert SpenglerDepartment of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Patrick RobertsDepartment of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, 07745, Jena, Germany. roberts@gea.mpg.de.

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council 771234HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council 851102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Bronze Age of Central Europe was a period of major social, economic, political and ideological change. The arrival of millet is often seen as part of wider Bronze Age connectivity, yet understanding of the subsistence regimes underpinning this dynamic period remains poor for this region, in large part due to a dominance of cremation funerary rites, which hinder biomolecular studies. Here, we apply stable isotope analysis, radiocarbon dating and archaeobotanical analysis to two Late Bronze Age (LBA) sites, Esperstedt and Kuckenburg, in central Germany, where human remains were inhumed rather than cremated. We find that people buried at these sites did not consume millet before the Middle Bronze Age (MBA) (ca. 1600 BCE). However, by the early LBA (ca. 1300-1050 BCE) people consumed millet, often in substantial quantities. This consumption appears to have subsequently diminished or ceased around 1050-800 BCE, despite charred millet grains still being found in the archaeological deposits from this period. The arrival of millet in this region, followed by a surge in consumption spanning two centuries, indicates a complex interplay of cultural and economic factors, as well as a potential use of millet to buffer changes in aridity in a region increasingly prone to crop failure in the face of climate change today.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyMilletsCarbon IsotopesEuropeGermanyHumansCarbon Isotopes

Identifiers

PMID38388679
PMCPMC10883991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.