Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38388667›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2024

Estimating the risk of brain metastasis for patients newly diagnosed with cancer.

Joseph A Miccio, Zizhong Tian, Sean S Mahase, Christine Lin, Serah Choi, Brad E Zacharia, Jason P Sheehan, Paul D Brown, Daniel M Trifiletti, Joshua D Palmer and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ionizing Radiation Enhances Prognostically Significant Cellular Immunity Programs in the Brain Metastasis Microenvironment.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph A MiccioDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA.
Zizhong TianDivision of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Sean S MahaseDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3488-6981
Christine LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA.
Serah ChoiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Brad E ZachariaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA.
Jason P SheehanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Paul D BrownDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Daniel M TrifilettiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Joshua D PalmerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3311-0129
Ming WangDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9977-7041
Nicholas G ZaorskyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA. Nicholas.Zaorsky@UHhospitals.org.
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center · USCase Western Reserve University · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USPennsylvania State University · USThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrain metastases (BM) affect clinical management and prognosis but limited resources exist to estimate BM risk in newly diagnosed cancer patients. Additionally, guidelines for brain MRI screening are limited. We aimed to develop and validate models to predict risk of BM at diagnosis for the most common cancer types that spread to the brain.

methodsBreast cancer, melanoma, kidney cancer, colorectal cancer (CRC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) data were extracted from the National Cancer Database to evaluate for the variables associated with the presence of BM at diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression (LR) models were developed and performance was evaluated with Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) and random-split training and testing datasets. Nomograms and a Webtool were created for each cancer type.

resultsWe identify 4,828,305 patients from 2010-2018 (2,095,339 breast cancer, 472,611 melanoma, 407,627 kidney cancer, 627,090 CRC, 164,864 SCLC, and 1,060,774 NSCLC). The proportion of patients with BM at diagnosis is 0.3%, 1.5%, 1.3%, 0.3%, 16.0%, and 10.3% for breast cancer, melanoma, kidney cancer, CRC, SCLC, and NSCLC, respectively. The average AUC over 100 random splitting for the LR models is 0.9534 for breast cancer, 0.9420 for melanoma, 0.8785 for CRC, 0.9054 for kidney cancer, 0.7759 for NSCLC, and 0.6180 for SCLC.

conclusionsWe develop accurate models that predict the BM risk at diagnosis for multiple cancer types. The nomograms and Webtool may aid clinicians in considering brain MRI at the time of initial cancer diagnosis.

Identifiers

PMID38388667
PMCPMC10883934
OpenAlexW4392042094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.