ArticleScientific reports2024
Dynamic educational recommender system based on Improved LSTM neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart library personalized resource proactive recommendation system integrating user profiling and knowledge graphs.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A deep learning based hybrid recommendation model for internet users.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nowadays, virtual learning environments have become widespread to avoid time and space constraints and share high-quality learning resources. As a result of human-computer interaction, student behaviors are recorded instantly. This work aims to design an educational recommendation system according to the individual's interests in educational resources. This system is evaluated based on clicking or downloading the source with the help of the user so that the appropriate resources can be suggested to users. In online tutorials, in addition to the problem of choosing the right source, we face the challenge of being aware of diversity in users' preferences and tastes, especially their short-term interests in the near future, at the beginning of a session. We assume that the user's interests consist of two parts: (1) the user's long-term interests, which include the user's constant interests based on the history of the user's dynamic activities, and (2) the user's short-term interests, which indicate the user's current interests. Due to the use of Bilstm networks and their gradual learning feature, the proposed model supports learners' behavioral changes. An average accuracy of 0.9978 and a Loss of 0.0051 offer more appropriate recommendations than similar works.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.