Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38388463›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2024

Come back when you're infected: pharmacy access to sterile syringes in an Arizona Secret Shopper Study, 2023.

Danielle M Russell, Beth E Meyerson, Arlene N Mahoney, Irene Garnett, Chris Ferrell, Kylee Newgass, Jon D Agley, Richard A Crosby, Keith G Bentele, Nina Vadiei and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danielle M RussellArizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Beth E MeyersonHarm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA. bmeyerson@arizona.edu.
Arlene N MahoneyHarm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Irene GarnettHarm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Chris FerrellDrug Policy Research and Advocacy Board (DPRAB), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Kylee NewgassSouthwest Recovery Alliance, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Jon D AgleyHarm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Richard A CrosbyHarm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Keith G BenteleHarm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Nina VadieiHarm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA.
David FrankHarm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Linnea B Linde-KriegerHarm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA.
University of Arizona · US

Funding

ASAP: Access to Syringes at Pharmacies for the Prevention of Bloodborne Infections among People who Inject DrugsR03DA053252 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI MEYERSON, BETH · 2021 to 2022
$154k
NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA053252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacies are critical healthcare partners in community efforts to eliminate bloodborne illnesses. Pharmacy sale of sterile syringes is central to this effort.

methodsA mixed methods "secret shopper" syringe purchase study was conducted in the fall of 2022 with 38 community pharmacies in Maricopa and Pima Counties, Arizona. Pharmacies were geomapped to within 2 miles of areas identified as having a potentially high volume of illicit drug commerce. Daytime venue sampling was used whereby separate investigators with lived/living drug use experience attempted to purchase syringes without a prescription. Investigator response when prompted for purchase rationale was "to protect myself from HIV and hepatitis C." A 24-item instrument measured sales outcome, pharmacy staff interaction (hostile/neutral/friendly), and the buyer's subjective experience.

resultsOnly 24.6% (n = 28) of 114 purchase attempts across the 38 pharmacies resulted in syringe sale. Less than one quarter (21.1%) of pharmacies always sold, while 44.7% never sold. Independent and food store pharmacies tended not to sell syringes. There emerged distinct pharmacy staff interactions characterized by body language, customer query, normalization or othering response, response to purchase request and closure. Pharmacy discretion and pharmacy policy not to sell syringes without a prescription limited sterile syringe access. Investigators reported frequent and adverse emotional impact due to pharmacy staff negative and stigmatizing interactions.

conclusionsPharmacies miss opportunities to advance efforts to eliminate bloodborne infections by stringent no-sale policy and discretion about syringe sale. State regulatory policy facilitating pharmacy syringe sales, limiting pharmacist discretion for syringe sales, and targeting pharmacy-staff level education may help advance the achievement of public health goals to eliminate bloodborne infections in Arizona.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPharmaciesPharmacySubstance Abuse, IntravenousArizonaHumansSyringesCommunity pharmaciesDelivery of health careEvidence-based pharmacy practiceHepatitis CHIV infectionsPublic healthSyringes

Identifiers

PMID38388463
PMCPMC10885601
OpenAlexW4392086013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.