Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38388186›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2024

Differences in Serum miRNA Profiles by Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status: Implications for Developing an Equitable Ovarian Cancer Screening Test.

Stephanie Alimena, Briana Joy K Stephenson, James W Webber, Laura Wollborn, Chad B Sussman, Daniel George Packard, Marta Williams, Cameron Elizabeth Comrie, Joyce Y Wang, Tahireh Markert and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. MicroRNAs and Cancer Racial Disparities.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie AlimenaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-9130-4904
Briana Joy K StephensonDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-6147-1039
James W WebberDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0009-0000-0090-119X
Laura WollbornDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0009-0007-3543-1643
Chad B SussmanHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-4907-0926
Daniel George PackardTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-1390-7221
Marta WilliamsHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0009-0003-9065-7398
Cameron Elizabeth ComrieHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-5677-4556
Joyce Y WangHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-7100-7312
Tahireh MarkertHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-9396-1067
Julia SpiegelBoston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.ORCID 0009-0001-1546-6749
Carmen B RodriguezHarvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-6849-8050
Maya LightfootTufts University, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0009-0007-9671-7776
Amia GrayeGeorgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia.ORCID 0009-0003-7684-6176
Sean O'ConnorLake Forest College, Lake Forest, Illinois.ORCID 0009-0002-0700-1340
Kevin M EliasDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-1502-5553
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USTufts University · USBoston College · USGeorgetown University · USHarvard University Press · USLake Forest College · US

Funding

Training Grant in Quantitative Sciences for Cancer ResearchT32CA009337 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI QUACKENBUSH, JOHN, TRIPPA, LORENZO · 1986 to 2025
$12.3M
Project 2: Combined personal neoantigen-targeting cancer vaccines with immune checkpoint blockade for ovarian cancerP50CA240243 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI CASTRO, CESAR M · 2020 to 2024
$11.5M
Ovarian cancer risk stratification using circulating miRNAs to assess BRCAnessR03CA283252 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ELIAS, KEVIN · 2023 to 2023
$116k
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA240243NCI NIH HHS R03 CA283252NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serum miRNAs are promising biomarkers for several clinical conditions, including ovarian cancer. To inform equitable implementation of these tests, we investigated the effects of race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status on serum miRNA profiles. Serum samples from a large institutional biobank were analyzed using a custom panel of 179 miRNA species highly expressed in human serum, measured using the Abcam Fireplex assay via flow cytometry. Data were log-transformed prior to analysis. Differences in miRNA by race and ethnicity were assessed using logistic regression. Pairwise t tests analyzed racial and ethnic differences among eight miRNAs previously associated with ovarian cancer risk. Pearson correlations determined the relationship between mean miRNA expression and the social deprivation index (SDI) for Massachusetts residents. Of 1,586 patients (76.9% white, non-Hispanic), compared with white, non-Hispanic patients, those from other racial and ethnic groups were younger (41.9 years ± 13.2 vs. 51.3 ± 15.1, P < 0.01) and had fewer comorbidities (3.5 comorbidities ± 2.7 vs. 4.6 ± 2.8, P < 0.01). On logistic regression, miRNAs predicted race and ethnicity at an AUC of 0.69 (95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.72), which remained consistent when stratified by most comorbidities. Among eight miRNAs previously associated with ovarian cancer risk, seven significantly varied by race and ethnicity (all P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in SDI for any of these eight miRNAs. miRNA expression is significantly influenced by race and ethnicity, which remained consistent after controlling for confounders. Understanding baseline differences in biomarker test characteristics prior to clinical implementation is essential to ensure instruments perform comparably across diverse populations. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: This study aimed to understand factors affecting miRNA expression, to ensure we create equitable screening tests for ovarian cancer that perform well in diverse populations. The goal is to ensure that we are detecting ovarian cancer cases earlier (secondary prevention) in women of all races, ethnic backgrounds, and socioeconomic means.

Indexed as

MicroRNAsOvarian NeoplasmsAdultEarly Detection of CancerEthnicityFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMiddle AgedRacial GroupsSocial ClassWhiteMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID38388186
PMCPMC11070176
OpenAlexW4392773852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.