Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38388111›Full record

ArticleThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2024

Variation in care and outcomes for people after hip fracture with and without cognitive impairment; results from the Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry.

Morag E Taylor, Lara A Harvey, Maria Crotty, Ian A Harris, Catherine Sherrington, Jacqueline C T Close

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Data resource profile: Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry (ANZHFR).Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Morag E TaylorFalls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; UNSW Ageing Futures Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Electronic address: morag.taylor@unsw.edu.au.
Lara A HarveyFalls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Maria CrottyCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Rehabilitation Unit, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Ian A HarrisIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
Catherine SherringtonSydney Musculoskeletal Health, Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jacqueline C T CloseFalls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUIngham Institute · AUSydney Local Health District · AUWomen's and Children's Health Network · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with dementia have poorer outcomes after hip fracture and this may be due in part to variation in care. We aimed to compare care and outcomes for people with and without cognitive impairment after hip fracture.

methodsRetrospective cohort study using Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry data for people ≥50 years of age who underwent hip fracture surgery (n = 49,063). Cognitive impairment or known dementia and cognitively healthy groups were defined using preadmission cognitive status. Descriptive statistics and multivariable mixed effects models were used to compare groups.

resultsIn general, cognitively impaired people had worse care and outcomes compared to cognitively healthy older people. A lower proportion of the cognitively impaired group had timely pain assessment (≤30 min of presentation: 61% vs 68%; p < 0.0001), were given the opportunity to mobilise (89% vs 93%; p < 0.0001) and achieved day-1 mobility (34% vs 58%; p < 0.0001) than the cognitively healthy group. A higher proportion of the cognitively impaired group had delayed pain management (>30 mins of presentation: 26% vs 20%; p < 0.0001), were malnourished (27% vs 15%; p < 0.0001), had delirium (44% vs 13%; p < 0.0001) and developed a new pressure injury (4% vs 3%; p < 0.0001) than the cognitively healthy group. Fewer of the cognitively impaired group received rehabilitation (35% vs 64%; p < 0.0001), particularly patients from RACFs (16% vs 39%; p < 0.0001) and were prescribed bone protection medication on discharge (24% vs 27%; p < 0.0001). Significantly more of the cognitively impaired group had a new transfer to residential care (46% vs 11% from private residence; p < 0.0001) and died at 30-days (7% vs 3% from private residence; 15% vs 10% from RACF; both p < 0.0001). In multivariable models adjusting for covariates with facility as the random effect, the cognitively impaired group had a greater odds of being malnourished, not achieving day-1 walking, having delirium in the week after surgery, dying within 30 days, and in those from private residences, having a new transfer to a residential care facility than the cognitively healthy group.

conclusionsWe have identified several aspects of care that could be improved for patients with cognitive impairment - management of pain, mobility, nutrition and bone health, as well as delirium assessment, prevention and management strategies and access to rehabilitation. Further research is needed to determine whether improvements in care will reduce hospital complications and improve outcomes for people with dementia after hip fracture.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDeliriumDementiaHip FracturesAgedAustraliaHumansNew ZealandRegistriesRetrospective StudiesBenchmarkingClinical guidelinesCognitive dysfunctionDementiaHip fractureMortality

Identifiers

PMID38388111
PMCPMC12877269
OpenAlexW4390937731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.