ArticleBMJ open quality2024
Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic in paediatric post-discharge care.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic dictated rapid reform in outpatient paediatric services. To reduce ward footfall and its associated infection risk, a trainee-led outpatient clinic was established with the aim to provide children with continuity of care following discharge from hospital. The service was created as a safe alternative to the long-standing practice of ward attenders while reducing mounting pressures on appointments at consultant-led clinics. Several issues arose in its implementation. A retrospective analysis with insights from service users found significant communication issues at various stages in referral, booking and follow-up management. This project aimed to reduce clinic non-attendance rates and ensure timely outpatient review with effective communication to all parties.Quality improvement methods allowed the problem to be understood and defined. Through consultation with service users in the start-up phase of the project, four key criteria were determined as essential for improving communication: indication, lead consultant, patient attendance and outcome letter provision. The project aimed to achieve 100% compliance across the four criteria during the 6-month project period. A baseline measure was established and measurements collected while five interventions were tested using plan-do-study-act test cycles.Following the small-scale tests, the run chart illustrated process improvement leading to meaningful change in outcome at both patient and service level. During the project, performance increased from a baseline median of one to a minimum of three out of four criteria being met for every patient. Several patients and families had a change in management as a direct result of their timely review and communication of clinic outcomes. These interventions resulted in a 50% reduction in the clinic's did not attend rate.The initial pandemic response to facilitate post-discharge care for children and young people led to frustrations surrounding communication breakdown among service users. Targeted interventions led to the development of a safer, more efficient service. Ongoing feedback continues to guide strategies for change with future work in service development focusing on capturing patient experience and improving patient-centred outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.