ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2024
Evaluating the Impact of the Tamm-Dancoff Approximation on X-ray Spectrum Calculations.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resonant Inelastic X-ray Scattering: How Well Does LR-TDDFT Perform?The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2025Article
- Highly Accurate and Robust Constraint-Based Orbital-Optimized Core Excitations.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The impact of the Tamm-Dancoff approximation (TDA) for time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) calculations of X-ray absorption and X-ray emission spectra (XAS and XES) is investigated, showing small discrepancies in the excitation energies and intensities. Through explicit diagonalization of the TDDFT Hessian, XES was considered by using full TDDFT with a core-hole reference state. This has previously not been possible with most TDDFT implementations as a result of the presence of negative eigenvalues. Furthermore, a core-valence separation (CVS) scheme for XES is presented, in which only elements including the core-hole are considered, resulting in a small Hessian with the dimension of the number of remaining occupied orbitals of the same spin as the core-hole (CH). The resulting spectra are in surprisingly good agreement with the full-space counterpart, illustrating the weak coupling between the valence-valence and valence-CH transitions. Complications resulting from contributions from the discretized continuum are discussed, which can occur for TDDFT calculations of XAS and XES and for TDA calculations of XAS. In conclusion, we recommend that TDA be used when calculating X-ray emission spectra, and either CVS-TDA or CVS-TDDFT can be used for X-ray absorption spectra.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.