Trial reportBMJ open2024
Randomised, blinded, cross-over evaluation of the palatability of and preference for different potassium binders in participants with chronic hyperkalaemia in the USA, Canada and Europe: the APPETIZE study.
Trial report in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04566653 (Non-Interventional, Exploratory, Phase IV, Single-Blind, Cross-Sectional, Randomised, Cross-over Study Evaluating Patient Palatability and Preference of 3 Potassium Binders in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease & Hyperkalaemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Non-Interventional, Exploratory, Phase IV, Single-Blind, Cross-Sectional, Randomised, Cross-over Study Evaluating Patient Palatability and Preference of 3 Potassium Binders in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease & Hyperkalaemia (APPETIZE).
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate versus sodium polystyrene sulfonate for treatment of hyperkalemia in hemodialysis patients: a randomized clinical trial.BMC nephrology · 2025Trial
- Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Hyperkalemia Management Under Cardio-Kidney-Protective Therapy: A Three-Stakeholder Cross-Sectional Survey.Electrolyte & blood pressure : E & BP · 2026Article
- Navigating the data-scarce landscape of pediatric hyperkalemia: a perspective on sodium zirconium cyclosilicate.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Article
- Guideline-Recommended Disease-Modifying Therapies for Patients with Cardiorenal Disease: A Call-to-Action Narrative Review.Advances in therapy · 2025Review
- Individualized Diets in Patients with Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplants: A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTraditional potassium (K
designPhase 4, randomised, participant-blinded, cross-over study. Participants were randomised to one of six taste sequences and, using a 'sip and spit' approach, tasted each K
setting17 centres across the USA, Canada and European Union.
participants144 participants with chronic kidney disease, hyperkalaemia and no recent use of K
main outcome measuresFor the primary (USA) and key secondary (Canada and European Union) endpoints, participants rated palatability attributes (taste, texture, smell and mouthfeel) and willingness to take each K
resultsIn each region, SZC and patiromer outperformed S/CPS on overall palatability (a composite of taste, texture, smell and mouthfeel), based on rational evaluation and emotional response. Taking the product once daily was more appealing for SZC and patiromer, creating greater receptivity than the idea of taking S/CPS. The emotional response to mouthfeel had the strongest influence on feelings about taking each product. In each region, a numerically greater proportion of participants ranked SZC as the most preferred K
conclusionsPreference for more palatable K TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04566653.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.