ArticleThe Science of the total environment2024
Machine learning-driven identification of air toxic combinations associated with asthma symptoms among elementary school children in Spokane, Washington, USA.
Article in The Science of the total environment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology With Environmental Exposures.Allergy · 2026Review
- Developing microenvironment classification models for personal exposure assessment based on global positioning system tracking data.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Environment and Human Health: Progress, Opportunities and Challenges.Current environmental health reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Air toxics are atmospheric pollutants with hazardous effects on health and the environment. Although methodological constraints have limited the number of air toxics assessed for associations with health and disease, advances in machine learning (ML) enable the assessment of a much larger set of environmental exposures. We used ML methods to conduct a retrospective study to identify combinations of 109 air toxics associated with asthma symptoms among 269 elementary school students in Spokane, Washington. Data on the frequency of asthma symptoms for these children were obtained from Spokane Public Schools. Their exposure to air toxics was estimated by using the Environmental Protection Agency's Air Toxics Screening Assessment and National Air Toxics Assessment. We defined three exposure periods: the most recent year (2019), the last three years (2017-2019), and the last five years (2014-2019). We analyzed the data using the ML-based Data-driven ExposurE Profile (DEEP) extraction method. DEEP identified 25 air toxic combinations associated with asthma symptoms in at least one exposure period. Three combinations (1,1,1-trichloroethane, 2-nitropropane, and 2,4,6-trichlorophenol) were significantly associated with asthma symptoms in all three exposure periods. Four air toxics (1,1,1-trichloroethane, 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, BIS (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), and 2,4-dinitrophenol) were associated only in combination with other toxics, and would not have been identified by traditional statistical methods. The application of DEEP also identified a vulnerable subpopulation of children who were exposed to 13 of the 25 significant combinations in at least one exposure period. On average, these children experienced the largest number of asthma symptoms in our sample. By providing evidence on air toxic combinations associated with childhood asthma, our findings may contribute to the regulation of these toxics to improve children's respiratory health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.