Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38387000›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2024

Characterization of the cryptic interspecific hybrid Lemna×mediterranea by an integrated approach provides new insights into duckweed diversity.

Luca Braglia, Simona Ceschin, M Adelaide Iannelli, Manuela Bog, Marco Fabriani, Giovanna Frugis, Floriana Gavazzi, Silvia Gianì, Flaminia Mariani, Maurizio Muzzi and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Transgenerational Plasticity Enhances the Tolerance of Duckweed (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  17. The Developmental Cycle ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Luca BragliaInstitute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology, National Research Council, Via Bassini 15, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6772-5362
Simona CeschinDepartment of Sciences, University of Roma Tre, Viale G. Marconi 446, 00146 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5964-1855
M Adelaide IannelliInstitute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology, National Research Council, Via Salaria Km. 29,300, 00015 Monterotondo, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4990-3978
Manuela BogInstitute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, University Greifswald, Soldmannstr. 15, D-17489 Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9979-8336
Marco FabrianiInstitute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology, National Research Council, Via Salaria Km. 29,300, 00015 Monterotondo, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-5258-9628
Giovanna FrugisInstitute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology, National Research Council, Via Salaria Km. 29,300, 00015 Monterotondo, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6405-7386
Floriana GavazziInstitute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology, National Research Council, Via Bassini 15, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5915-888X
Silvia GianìInstitute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology, National Research Council, Via Bassini 15, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8740-1787
Flaminia MarianiDepartment of Sciences, University of Roma Tre, Viale G. Marconi 446, 00146 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5415-7447
Maurizio MuzziDepartment of Sciences, University of Roma Tre, Viale G. Marconi 446, 00146 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6066-1463
Emanuele PelellaDepartment of Sciences, University of Roma Tre, Viale G. Marconi 446, 00146 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5402-8311
Laura MorelloInstitute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology, National Research Council, Via Bassini 15, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8854-1770

Funding

European CommissionNational Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lemnaceae taxonomy is challenged by the particular morphology of these tiny free-floating angiosperms. Although molecular taxonomy has helped clarify the phylogenetic history of this family, some inconsistency with morphological data leads to frequent misclassifications in the genus Lemna. Recently, the finding that Lemna japonica is an interspecific hybrid between Lemna minor and Lemna turionifera provided a clear explanation for one such taxonomic question. Here we demonstrated that L. minor is also capable of hybridizing with Lemna gibba, generating a cryptic but widespread taxon in the Mediterranean area. The nothotaxon Lemna ×mediterranea is described and compared with clones of the putative parental species L. minor and L. gibba. Genetic analysis by nuclear and plastid markers, as well as genome size measurement, revealed that two different cytotypes, diploid and triploid, originated by at least two independent hybridization events. Despite high overall similarity, morphometrical, physiological, and biochemical analyses showed an intermediate position of L. ×mediterranea between its parental species in most qualitative and quantitative characters, and also separation of the two hybrid cytotypes by some criteria. These data provide evidence that hybridization and polyploidization, driving forces of terrestrial plant evolution, contribute to duckweed genetic diversity and may have shaped the phylogenetic history of these mainly asexual, aquatic plants.

Indexed as

AraceaeHybridization, GeneticPhylogenyBiodiversityGenetic VariationGenome, PlantPolyploidyAquatic plantscytotypeDNA barcodingduckweedinterspecific hybridsLemna gibbaLemna mediterraneaLemna minormorphometry

Identifiers

PMID38387000
PMCPMC11103106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.