Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38386895›Full record

ArticleGenetics2024

Interpreting generative adversarial networks to infer natural selection from genetic data.

Rebecca Riley, Iain Mathieson, Sara Mathieson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The persistence and loss of hard selective sweeps amid admixture in ancient Eurasians.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Phylogenetic Methods Meet Deep Learning.Genome biology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Digital Image Processing to Detect Adaptive Evolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  16. Computational Genomics and Its Applications to Anthropological Questions.American journal of biological anthropology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rebecca RileyDepartment of Computer Science, Haverford College, Haverford, PA 19041, USA.
Iain MathiesonDepartment of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4256-3982
Sara MathiesonDepartment of Computer Science, Haverford College, Haverford, PA 19041, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0484-0838

Funding

Adaptive evolutionary inference frameworks for understudied populations using generative neural networksR15HG011528 · NHGRI · HAVERFORD COLLEGE · PI MATHIESON, SARA · 2021 to 2024
$783k
NHGRI NIH HHS R15 HG011528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding natural selection and other forms of non-neutrality is a major focus for the use of machine learning in population genetics. Existing methods rely on computationally intensive simulated training data. Unlike efficient neutral coalescent simulations for demographic inference, realistic simulations of selection typically require slow forward simulations. Because there are many possible modes of selection, a high dimensional parameter space must be explored, with no guarantee that the simulated models are close to the real processes. Finally, it is difficult to interpret trained neural networks, leading to a lack of understanding about what features contribute to classification. Here we develop a new approach to detect selection and other local evolutionary processes that requires relatively few selection simulations during training. We build upon a generative adversarial network trained to simulate realistic neutral data. This consists of a generator (fitted demographic model), and a discriminator (convolutional neural network) that predicts whether a genomic region is real or fake. As the generator can only generate data under neutral demographic processes, regions of real data that the discriminator recognizes as having a high probability of being "real" do not fit the neutral demographic model and are therefore candidates for targets of selection. To incentivize identification of a specific mode of selection, we fine-tune the discriminator with a small number of custom non-neutral simulations. We show that this approach has high power to detect various forms of selection in simulations, and that it finds regions under positive selection identified by state-of-the-art population genetic methods in three human populations. Finally, we show how to interpret the trained networks by clustering hidden units of the discriminator based on their correlation patterns with known summary statistics.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerGenetics, PopulationGenomicsHumansSelection, Geneticgenerative adversarial networksinterpretabilitymachine learningnatural selectionpopulation genetics

Identifiers

PMID38386895
PMCPMC10990424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.