ArticleGenetics2024
Interpreting generative adversarial networks to infer natural selection from genetic data.
Article in Genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- GPC: An expressive and tractable deep generative model for genetic variation data.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Genomic insights into natural selection in recent human history.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- On the use of generative models for demographic inference in malaria vectors from genomic data.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Machine learning for evolutionary genetics and molecular evolution.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2026Review
- The persistence and loss of hard selective sweeps amid admixture in ancient Eurasians.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- AI solutions for evolutionary genomics of nonmodel species.Evolution letters · 2026Review
- Sharing approaches in predictive genomics across animals, plants and humans.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Multiple-testing corrections in selection scans using identity-by-descent segments.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- The persistence and loss of hard selective sweeps amid ancient human admixture.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Interpreting Supervised Machine Learning Inferences in Population Genomics Using Haplotype Matrix Permutations.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Phylogenetic Methods Meet Deep Learning.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Article
- ConfuseNN: Interpreting convolutional neural network inferences in population genomics with data shuffling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Multiple-testing corrections in selection scans using identity-by-descent segments.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Digital Image Processing to Detect Adaptive Evolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Computational Genomics and Its Applications to Anthropological Questions.American journal of biological anthropology · 2024Review
- Deep learning-based design and experimental validation of a medicine-like human antibody library.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Modeling recent positive selection using identity-by-descent segments.American journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- Tree Sequences as a General-Purpose Tool for Population Genetic Inference.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Tree sequences as a general-purpose tool for population genetic inference.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding natural selection and other forms of non-neutrality is a major focus for the use of machine learning in population genetics. Existing methods rely on computationally intensive simulated training data. Unlike efficient neutral coalescent simulations for demographic inference, realistic simulations of selection typically require slow forward simulations. Because there are many possible modes of selection, a high dimensional parameter space must be explored, with no guarantee that the simulated models are close to the real processes. Finally, it is difficult to interpret trained neural networks, leading to a lack of understanding about what features contribute to classification. Here we develop a new approach to detect selection and other local evolutionary processes that requires relatively few selection simulations during training. We build upon a generative adversarial network trained to simulate realistic neutral data. This consists of a generator (fitted demographic model), and a discriminator (convolutional neural network) that predicts whether a genomic region is real or fake. As the generator can only generate data under neutral demographic processes, regions of real data that the discriminator recognizes as having a high probability of being "real" do not fit the neutral demographic model and are therefore candidates for targets of selection. To incentivize identification of a specific mode of selection, we fine-tune the discriminator with a small number of custom non-neutral simulations. We show that this approach has high power to detect various forms of selection in simulations, and that it finds regions under positive selection identified by state-of-the-art population genetic methods in three human populations. Finally, we show how to interpret the trained networks by clustering hidden units of the discriminator based on their correlation patterns with known summary statistics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.