Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38386788›Full record

ArticleInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Identify risk factors for perioperative outcomes in Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion and Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion with Robotic Cystectomy.

Hangcheng Fu, Laura Davis, Venkat Ramakrishnan, Thomas Barefoot, Colleen Sholtes, Lifan Liang, Mohammed Said, Jamie Messer

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hangcheng FuDepartment of Urology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States.
Laura DavisDepartment of Urology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States.
Venkat RamakrishnanDepartment of Urology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States.
Thomas BarefootDepartment of Urology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States.
Colleen SholtesDepartment of Urology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States.
Lifan LiangDepartment of Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States.
Mohammed SaidDepartment of Urology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States.
Jamie MesserDepartment of Urology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States.
University of Louisville · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe increasing adoption of robotic-assisted cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD), despite its complexity, prompts a detailed comparison with extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD). Our study at a single institution investigates perioperative outcomes and identifies risk factors impacting the success of these surgical approaches.

methodsIn this retrospective analysis, 174 patients who underwent robotic-assisted cystectomy at the University of Louisville from June 2016 to August 2021 were reviewed. The cohort was divided into two groups based on the urinary diversion method: 30 patients underwent ECUD and 144 underwent ICUD. Data on demographics, complication rates, length of hospital stay, and readmission rates were meticulously collected and analyzed.

resultsOperative times were comparable between the ICUD and ECUD groups. However, the ICUD group had a significantly lower intraoperative transfusion rate (0.5 vs. 1.0, p=0.02) and shorter hospital stay (7.8 vs. 12.3 days, p<0.001). Factors such as male sex, smoking history, diabetes mellitus, intravesical therapy, higher ASA, and ACCI scores were associated with increased Clavien-Dindo Grade 3 or higher complications. Age over 70 was the sole factor linked to a higher 90-day readmission rate, with no specific characteristics influencing the 30-day rate.

conclusionRobotic cystectomy with ICUD results in shorter hospitalizations and lower intraoperative transfusion rates compared to ECUD, without differences in operative time, high-grade postoperative complications, or readmission rates. These findings can inform clinical decision-making, highlighting ICUD as a potentially more favorable option in appropriate settings.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresUrinary DiversionCystectomyHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsRobotic Surgical ProceduresUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrinary Diversion

Identifiers

PMID38386788
PMCPMC10953604
OpenAlexW4393991092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.