Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38386690›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

Diverse mutant selection windows shape spatial heterogeneity in evolving populations.

Eshan S King, Dagim S Tadele, Beck Pierce, Michael Hinczewski, Jacob G Scott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Epistasis-mediated compensatory evolution in a fitness landscape with adaptational tradeoffs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Cell-cell fusion in cancer: The next cancer hallmark?The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology · 2024
    Review
  6. Reinforcement learning informs optimal treatment strategies to limit antibiotic resistance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eshan S KingCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0345-3780
Dagim S TadeleDepartment of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.
Beck PierceDepartment of Mathematics, Applied Mathematics, and Statistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.
Michael HinczewskiDepartment of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.
Jacob G ScottCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2971-7673

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007250 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, ALEX YEE-CHEN · 1985 to 2023
$33.4M
Medical Scientist Training Program at Case Western Reserve UniversityT32GM152319 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Heather Broihier, Alex Yee-Chen Huang · 2024 to 2026
$5.1M
Exploiting Ecology and Evolution to Prevent Therapy Resistance in EGFR-Driven Lung CancerR37CA244613 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI Jacob Gardinier Scott · 2020 to 2026
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA244613NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007250NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM152319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutant selection windows (MSWs), the range of drug concentrations that select for drug-resistant mutants, have long been used as a model for predicting drug resistance and designing optimal dosing strategies in infectious disease. The canonical MSW model offers comparisons between two subtypes at a time: drug-sensitive and drug-resistant. In contrast, the fitness landscape model with N alleles, which maps genotype to fitness, allows comparisons between N genotypes simultaneously, but does not encode continuous drug response data. In clinical settings, there may be a wide range of drug concentrations selecting for a variety of genotypes in both cancer and infectious diseases. Therefore, there is a need for a more robust model of the pathogen response to therapy to predict resistance and design new therapeutic approaches. Fitness seascapes, which model genotype-by-environment interactions, permit multiple MSW comparisons simultaneously by encoding genotype-specific dose-response data. By comparing dose-response curves, one can visualize the range of drug concentrations where one genotype is selected over another. In this work, we show how N-allele fitness seascapes allow for N * 2N-1 unique MSW comparisons. In spatial drug diffusion models, we demonstrate how fitness seascapes reveal spatially heterogeneous MSWs, extending the MSW model to more fully reflect the selection of drug resistant genotypes. Furthermore, using synthetic data and empirical dose-response data in cancer, we find that the spatial structure of MSWs shapes the evolution of drug resistance in an agent-based model. By simulating a tumor treated with cyclic drug therapy, we find that mutant selection windows introduced by drug diffusion promote the proliferation of drug resistant cells. Our work highlights the importance and utility of considering dose-dependent fitness seascapes in evolutionary medicine.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsGenotypeHumansMutationSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID38386690
PMCPMC10914271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.