Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38386376›Full record

Observational studyJournal of medical Internet research2024

Living Lab Data of Patient Needs and Expectations for eHealth-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation in Germany and Spain From the TIMELY Study: Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Boris Schmitz, Svenja Wirtz, Manuela Sestayo-Fernández, Hendrik Schäfer, Emma R Douma, Marta Alonso Vazquez, Violeta González-Salvado, Mirela Habibovic, Dimitris Gatsios, Willem Johan Kop and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05461729 (TIMELY-PrädiktoR Prospective Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05461729 recruitingnot on this map

TIMELY-PrädiktoR Prospective Study

TypeobservationalSponsorDr. Boris SchmitzRan2021 to 2029Enrolled1,200ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Boris SchmitzDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7041-7424
Svenja WirtzDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1853-5869
Manuela Sestayo-FernándezHealth Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7109-816X
Hendrik SchäferDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8598-9003
Emma R DoumaCenter of Research on Psychological Disorders and Somatic Diseases, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0001-2141-0784
Marta Alonso VazquezHealth Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0009-0005-9341-0694
Violeta González-SalvadoCardiology and Coronary Care Department, IDIS, CIBER CV, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2101-284X
Mirela HabibovicCenter of Research on Psychological Disorders and Somatic Diseases, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1460-7693
Dimitris GatsiosCapemed, Ioannina, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-3006-1587
Willem Johan KopCenter of Research on Psychological Disorders and Somatic Diseases, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3141-4815
Carlos Peña-GilCardiology and Coronary Care Department, IDIS, CIBER CV, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5263-5572
Frank MoorenDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0258-2732
Witten/Herdecke University · DETilburg University · NLInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago · ESUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of eHealth technology in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a promising approach to enhance patient outcomes since adherence to healthy lifestyles and risk factor management during phase III CR maintenance is often poorly supported. However, patients' needs and expectations have not been extensively analyzed to inform the design of such eHealth solutions.

objectiveThe goal of this study was to provide a detailed patient perspective on the most important functionalities to include in an eHealth solution to assist them in phase III CR maintenance.

methodsA guided survey as part of a Living Lab approach was conducted in Germany (n=49) and Spain (n=30) involving women (16/79, 20%) and men (63/79, 80%) with coronary artery disease (mean age 57 years, SD 9 years) participating in a structured center-based CR program. The survey covered patients' perceived importance of different CR components in general, current usage of technology/technical devices, and helpfulness of the potential features of eHealth in CR. Questionnaires were used to identify personality traits (psychological flexibility, optimism/pessimism, positive/negative affect), potentially predisposing patients to acceptance of an app/monitoring devices.

resultsAll the patients in this study owned a smartphone, while 30%-40% used smartwatches and fitness trackers. Patients expressed the need for an eHealth platform that is user-friendly, personalized, and easily accessible, and 71% (56/79) of the patients believed that technology could help them to maintain health goals after CR. Among the offered components, support for regular physical exercise, including updated schedules and progress documentation, was rated the highest. In addition, patients rated the availability of information on diagnosis, current medication, test results, and risk scores as (very) useful. Of note, for each item, except smoking cessation, 35%-50% of the patients indicated a high need for support to achieve their long-term health goals, suggesting the need for individualized care. No major differences were detected between Spanish and German patients (all P>.05) and only younger age (P=.03) but not sex, education level, or personality traits (all P>.05) were associated with the acceptance of eHealth components.

conclusionsThe patient perspectives collected in this study indicate high acceptance of personalized user-friendly eHealth platforms with remote monitoring to improve adherence to healthy lifestyles among patients with coronary artery disease during phase III CR maintenance. The identified patient needs comprise support in physical exercise, including regular updates on personalized training recommendations. Availability of diagnoses, laboratory results, and medications, as part of a mobile electronic health record were also rated as very useful.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05461729; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05461729.

Indexed as

Cardiac RehabilitationCoronary Artery DiseaseTelemedicineAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationSpainacceptanceappapplicationsappsattitudeattitudescardiaccardiologycoronarycoronary artery diseaseeHealthexperienceexperiencesheartliving labmHealthmobile healthmobile phonemonitoringopinionpatient empowermentperceptionperceptionspersonalized medicineperspectiveperspectivesrehabilitationsurveysurveystechnology usetelehealthtelemedicineusage

Identifiers

PMID38386376
PMCPMC10921324
OpenAlexW4391375821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.