ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
Development of a Machine-Learning-Based Tool for Overnight Orthokeratology Lens Fitting.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in pediatric myopia - a narrative review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- The "Three-Tier Regulatory Network" of Orthokeratology in Myopia Control: Evidence Weight of Underlying Mechanisms, Controversies, and New Perspectives for Clinical Translation--A Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Assessing large language models as assistive tools in selecting first trial lens parameters for orthokeratology.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence applications in refractive error management: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Standardized Corneal Topography-Driven AI for Orthokeratology Fitting: A Hybrid Deep/Machine Learning Approach With Enhanced Generalizability.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Optometry: Current and Future Perspectives.Clinical optometry · 2025Review
- AI-assisted automated interpretation of corneal topography in orthokeratology patients: enhancing diagnostic precision and efficiency.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- An integrative predictive model for orthokeratology lens decentration based on diverse metrics.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Shaping the future of myopia with artificial intelligence: Mapping trends and promising directions.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchArticle
- A narrative review on orthokeratology for myopia control: Lens design, combination therapies, and clinical management.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Orthokeratology (ortho-K) is widely used to control myopia. Overnight ortho-K lens fitting with the selection of appropriate parameters is an important technique for achieving successful reductions in myopic refractive error. In this study, we developed a machine-learning model that could select ortho-K lens parameters at an expert level. Methods: Machine-learning models were established to predict the optimal ortho-K parameters, including toric lens option (toric or non-toric), overall diameter (OAD; 10.5 or 11.0 mm), base curve (BC), return zone depth (RZD), landing zone angle (LZA), and lens sagittal depth (LensSag). The analysis included 547 eyes of 297 Korean adolescents with myopia or astigmatism. The dataset was randomly divided into training (80%, n = 437 eyes) and validation (20%, n = 110 eyes) sets at the patient level. The model was trained based on clinical ortho-K lens fitting performed by highly experienced experts and ophthalmic measurements. Results: The final machine-learning models showed accuracies of 92.7% and 86.4% for predicting the toric lens option and OAD, respectively. The mean absolute errors for the BC, RZD, LZA, and LensSag predictions were 0.052 mm, 2.727 µm, 0.118°, and 5.215 µm, respectively. The machine-learning model outperformed the manufacturer's conventional initial lens selector in predicting BC and RZD. Conclusions: We developed an expert-level machine-learning-based model for determining comprehensive ortho-K lens parameters. We also created a web-based application. Translational Relevance: This model may provide more accurate fitting parameters for lenses than those of conventional calculations, thus reducing the need to rely on trial and error.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.