Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38386320›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2024

Intensive vs Conventional Blood Pressure Control After Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sherief Ghozy, Ali Mortezaei, Mohamed Elfil, Mariam Abdelghaffar, Hassan Kobeissi, Mohammad Aladawi, Alzhraa S Abbas, Sandeep S Nayak, Ramanathan Kadirvel, Alejandro A Rabinstein and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Error in Affiliations.JAMA network open · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sherief GhozyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Ali MortezaeiDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mohamed ElfilDepartment of Neurological Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.
Mariam AbdelghaffarDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Hassan KobeissiDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mohammad AladawiDepartment of Neurological Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.
Alzhraa S AbbasEvidence-Based Practice Center, Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Sandeep S NayakDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale New Haven Health Bridgeport Hospital, Bridgeport, Connecticut.
Ramanathan KadirvelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Alejandro A RabinsteinDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
David F KallmesDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mayo Clinic · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · USBridgeport Hospital · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO), but optimal post-EVT blood pressure (BP) control remains debated. Objective: To assess the association of different systolic BP targets following EVT with functional outcomes, mortality, and complications in patients with AIS due to LVO. Data Sources: Systematic review and meta-analysis of databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) to September 8, 2023. Study Selection: Inclusion criteria consisted of randomized clinical trials examining post-EVT management of systolic BP in patients with AIS and LVO comparing intensive vs conventional targets. Nonrandomized studies, observational studies, noninterventional trials, meeting abstracts, duplicate studies, studies with overlapping data, and non-English language studies were excluded. Two authors independently applied these criteria through a blinded review, with discrepancies resolved through consensus. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. Data Extraction and Synthesis: This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Three authors extracted data regarding study characteristics, baseline patient data, and outcomes of interest. The pooled data were analyzed using a random-effects meta-analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rates of functional independence, 90-day mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and hypotensive events. Results: A total of 4 randomized clinical trials with 1571 initially enrolled patients were included in the analysis. Lower functional independence rates were observed in the intensive control group (relative risk [RR], 0.81 [95% CI, 0.67-0.98]). No significant differences were found in 90-day mortality (RR, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.92-1.52]), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (RR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.75-1.67]), or hypotensive events (RR, 1.80 [95% CI, 0.37-8.76]). There was minimal heterogeneity among the studies included in the functional independence outcome (I2 = 13% and τ2 = 0.003), which was absent among other outcomes (I2 = 0 and τ2 = 0). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that intensive post-EVT BP reduction does not yield benefits and may carry risks. While awaiting the results of additional ongoing trials, a conservative BP management strategy after endovascular recanalization is favored in daily practice.

Indexed as

Blood PressureIschemic StrokeThrombectomyAgedEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38386320
PMCPMC10884884
OpenAlexW4392035099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.