ArticleBiological trace element research2024
Comparison of Heavy Metals in Urine Samples of Smoker and Non-smoker Persons.
Article in Biological trace element research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of heavy metals and radon gas in the urine samples: a comparative study between workers of car mechanics and non-car mechanics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Sex-Specific Associations Between Cadmium Exposure and Mortality Risk in Cardiovascular Disease Patients: A Cohort Study Integrating Molecular Mechanisms of Myocardial Dysfunction.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2026Article
- Heavy Metal Transfer from Cigarette Smoke to Lung Tissue: Inducing on Pulmonary Function and Bronchoalveolar Microbiome Dysregulation in Rats.Biological trace element research · 2026Article
- Assessment of metal exposure in fingernails of patients with nasopharyngeal cancer: a case study in Vietnamese men.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2026Article
- Heavy Metal-Gut Microbiota Interactions: Probiotics Modulation and Biosensors Detection.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Human exposure to chromite mining pollution, the toxicity mechanism and health impact.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Cotinine exposure enhances the association of blood manganese and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in American children: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, the concentrations of heavy metals such as cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), and lead (Pb) in the two groups of cigarette smokers and non-smokers in five age range groups were measured. Heavy metal concentrations were collected in participants' urine samples and analyzed using atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS). The results showed that the concentrations of these metals in the urine of smokers were higher than in non-smoker subjects. The mean concentration of Cd, Cr, and Pb for smokers were 1.188 ± 0.931, 1.929 ± 0.940, and 0.069 ± 0.023, respectively, while the mean concentration of Cd, Cr, and Pb for non-smokers were 0.151 ± 0.165, 0.203 ± 0.218, and 0.037 ± 0.030, respectively. The results revealed statistically significant differences when comparing the samples of smokers to the control group in all heavy metals in the present study. Also, the results revealed statistically significant differences in Cd, Cr, and Pb when comparing the samples of smokers to age groups. The trend of metals in urine samples in two groups (smokers and non-smokers) is as follows: Cd > Cr > Pb. The concentration of Cd, Cr, and Pb in all samples of the present study was higher than the biological limit, according to ACGIH. Therefore, Cd, Cr, and Pb were the most critical metals accumulated in the urine of cigarette smokers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.