ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2024
Improved reconstruction for highly accelerated propeller diffusion 1.5 T clinical MRI.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation and feasibility of a deep learning-based reconstruction technology in 5.0 tesla knee joint MR imaging.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePropeller fast-spin-echo diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (FSE-dMRI) is essential for the diagnosis of Cholesteatoma. However, at clinical 1.5 T MRI, its signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) remains relatively low. To gain sufficient SNR, signal averaging (number of excitations, NEX) is usually used with the cost of prolonged scan time. In this work, we leveraged the benefits of Locally Low Rank (LLR) constrained reconstruction to enhance the SNR. Furthermore, we enhanced both the speed and SNR by employing Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for the accelerated PROPELLER FSE-dMRI on a 1.5 T clinical scanner.
methodsResidual U-Net (RU-Net) was found to be efficient for propeller FSE-dMRI data. It was trained to predict 2-NEX images obtained by Locally Low Rank (LLR) constrained reconstruction and used 1-NEX images obtained via simplified reconstruction as the inputs. The brain scans from healthy volunteers and patients with cholesteatoma were performed for model training and testing. The performance of trained networks was evaluated with normalized root-mean-square-error (NRMSE), structural similarity index measure (SSIM), and peak SNR (PSNR).
resultsFor 4 × under-sampled with 7 blades data, online reconstruction appears to provide suboptimal images-some small details are missing due to high noise interferences. Offline LLR enables suppression of noises and discovering some small structures. RU-Net demonstrated further improvement compared to LLR by increasing 18.87% of PSNR, 2.11% of SSIM, and reducing 53.84% of NRMSE. Moreover, RU-Net is about 1500 × faster than LLR (0.03 vs. 47.59 s/slice).
conclusionThe LLR remarkably enhances the SNR compared to online reconstruction. Moreover, RU-Net improves propeller FSE-dMRI as reflected in PSNR, SSIM, and NRMSE. It requires only 1-NEX data, which allows a 2 × scan time reduction. In addition, its speed is approximately 1500 times faster than that of LLR-constrained reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.