ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2024
Multi-target field control for matrix gradient coils.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveConventional single-target field control for matrix gradient coils will add control complexity in MRI spatial encoding, such as designing specialized fields and sequences. This complexity can be reduced by multi-target field control, which is realized by optimizing the coil structure according to target fields.
methodsBased on the principle of multi-target field control, the X, Y and Z gradient fields can be set as target fields, and all coil elements can then be divided into three groups to generate these fields. An improved simulated annealing algorithm is proposed to optimize the coil element distribution of each group to generate the corresponding target field. In the improved simulated annealing process, two swapping modes are presented, and randomly selected with certain probabilities that are set to 0.25, 0.5 and 0.75, respectively. The flexibility of the final designed structure is demonstrated by a spherical harmonic basis up to the full second order with single-target field control. An experimental platform is built to measure the gradient fields generated by the designed structure with multi-target target control.
resultsWith three probabilities of swapping modes, three similar coil element distributions are optimized, and their maximum magnetic field errors for generating X, Y and Z gradients are all below 5%. The structure selected for the final design is the one with a probability of 0.75, considering the coil performance and structural symmetry. The maximum error for all target fields generated by single-target field control is also below 5%. The experimental results show that the measured gradient fields along the axes have enough strength and high linearity.
conclusionsWith the proposed improved simulated annealing algorithm and swapping modes, multi-target field control for matrix gradient coils is verified and achieved in this study by optimizing the coil element distribution. Moreover, this study provides a solution to simplify the complexity of controlling the matrix gradient coil in spatial encoding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38386153What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.