Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38386137›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2024

In-House Intraoperative Monitoring in Neurosurgery in England - Benefits and Challenges.

Menaka Pasangy Paranathala, Stephan Jaiser, Mohammed Akbar Hussain, Ana Mirallave-Pescador, Christopher J A Cowie, Mark R Baker, Damian Holliman, Charles Alexander Fry

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Menaka Pasangy ParanathalaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle, NE1 4LP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9272-5441
Stephan JaiserDepartment of Neurophysiology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle, NE1 4LP, UK.
Mohammed Akbar HussainDepartment of Neurosurgery, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle, NE1 4LP, UK.
Ana Mirallave-PescadorDepartment of Neurophysiology, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
Christopher J A CowieDepartment of Neurosurgery, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle, NE1 4LP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0439-2278
Mark R BakerDepartment of Neurophysiology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle, NE1 4LP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6916-1329
Damian HollimanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle, NE1 4LP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9661-1150
Charles Alexander FryDepartment of Neurophysiology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle, NE1 4LP, UK. Charles.Fry@nhs.net.
Royal Victoria Infirmary · GBKing's College Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM) is a valuable adjunct for neurosurgical operative techniques, and has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in cranial and spinal surgery. It is not necessarily provided by NHS hospitals so may be outsourced to private companies, which are expensive and at cost to the NHS trusts. We discuss the benefits and challenges of developing an in-house service.

methodsWe surveyed NHS neurosurgical departments across England regarding their expenditure on IOM over the period January 2018 - December 2022 on cranial neurosurgery and spinal surgery. Out of 24 units, all responded to our Freedom of Information requests and 21 provided data. The standard NHS England salary of NHS staff who would normally be involved in IOM, including physiologists and doctors, was also compiled for comparison.

resultsThe total spend on outsourced IOM, across the units who responded, was over £8 million in total for the four years. The annual total increased, between 2018 and 2022, from £1.1 to £3.5 million. The highest single unit yearly spend was £568,462. This is in addition to salaries for staff in neurophysiology departments. The mean NHS salaries for staff is also presented.

conclusionIOM is valuable in surgical decision-making, planning, and technique, having been shown to lead to fewer patient complications and shorter length of stay. Current demand for IOM outstrips the internal NHS provision in many trusts across England, leading to outsourcing to private companies. This is at significant cost to the NHS. Although there is a learning curve, there are many benefits to in-house provision, such as stable working relationships, consistent methods, training of the future IOM workforce, and reduced long-term costs, which planned expansion of NHS services may provide.

Indexed as

NeurosurgeryEnglandHealth ExpendituresHospitalsHumansMonitoring, IntraoperativeCostEconomicFinancialIntraoperative MonitoringNeurophysiologyNeurosurgerySpinal Surgery

Identifiers

PMID38386137
OpenAlexW4392052625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.