ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024
Robotic surgery: public perceptions and current misconceptions.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- From expectations to experiences: a systematic review of patient and public perspectives on robotic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Public Perceptions and Determinants of Preference for Robotic-Assisted Surgery in the United Arab Emirates: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Responsible adoption of robot-assisted surgery within health systems in middle-income countries: a narrative review and practical governance framework.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Humanization of Surgical Care in the Robotic Age: A Triangular Interaction Model Between the Surgeon, the Patient, and the Technology.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Beyond the console: surgeon's perceptions & attitudes towards robotic surgery in Saudi Arabia: a nationwide cross- sectional survey.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Bridging perception and reality: understanding Chinese women's behavioral intentions toward robot-assisted gynecologic surgery.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Robotic-assisted surgery in Egypt: national insights into awareness, knowledge, and perceptions among surgeons and patients.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Patient expectations and concerns regarding robotic thyroidectomy in china: a cross-sectional study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Postoperative complication rates of surgeons during the supervised training program in robotic-assisted colorectal surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Industry Payments and Sentiments Toward Robotic Surgery Among US Physicians.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Single-Port Access Laparoscopic and Single-Site Robotic Surgery in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Single-Center Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Does the use of robotic technology in knee arthroplasty provide superior clinical outcomes?Joint diseases and related surgery · 2025Article
- Surgical Preferences and Fears: Misconceptions about Robotic-Assisted Surgery.Urologia internationalis · 2025Article
- Is It the Best Option? Robotic Surgery for Endometriosis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Clinical Efficacy Over Privacy: Public Prioritization of Risk Dimensions in Telesurgery Acceptance Among Young Adults with Higher Education.Telemedicine reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whilst surgeons and robotic companies are key stakeholders involved in the adoption of robotic assisted surgery (RS), the public's role is overlooked. However, given that patients hold ultimate power over their healthcare decisions, public acceptance of RS is crucial. Therefore, this study aims to identify public understanding, opinions, and misconceptions about RS. An online questionnaire distributed between February and May 2021 ascertained the views of UK adults on RS. The themes of questions included familiarity, experience and comfort with RS, opinions on its ethical implications, and the impact of factual information provided to the participant. The data were evaluated using thematic and statistical analysis, including assessing for statistical differences in age, gender, education level, and presence in the medical field. Overall, 216 responses were analysed. Participants were relatively uninformed about RS, with a median knowledge score of 4.00(2.00-6.00) on a 10-point Likert scale. Fears surrounding increased risk, reduced precision and technological failure were identified, alongside misconceptions about its autonomous nature. However, providing factual information in the survey about RS statistically increased participant comfort (p = < 0.0001). Most (61.8%) participants believed robot manufacturers were responsible for malfunctions, but doctors were held accountable more by older, less educated, and non-medical participants. Our findings suggest that there is limited public understanding of RS. The numerous common misconceptions identified present a major barrier to the widespread acceptance of RS, since inaccurate fears about its nature could discourage potential patients from engaging with robotic procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.