Malignant ureteral obstruction: comparison of metallic, 8 French and 6 French ureteric stents after failure of initial ureteric stent.

purposeMalignant ureteric obstruction is a significant management challenge. The failure of ureteric stents often leads to long-term nephrostomy tubes. This is delayed for as long as possible due to its' associated morbidity. Several types of ureteric stents are available, however there is little evidence demonstrating which stents are better for preventing progression to nephrostomy tubes. This study looked to determine whether a new 6 French (Fr) polymer stent, 8Fr polymer stent or metallic stent achieved a longer functional duration once the initial polymer ureteric stent failed.

methodsA retrospective, longitudinal study was performed at a single tertiary institution. All patients who underwent ureteric stenting with a 6Fr polymer stent for malignancy between 2010 and 2020 were included. Patients were followed up until death with ureteric stent in situ or permanent nephrostomy tube insertion.

resultsA total of 46 patients (66 ureters) had ureteric stents inserted for malignancy. From initial ureteric stent failure, 10 stents were changed to a new 6Fr polymer stent, 42 were changed to an 8Fr polymer stent and 14 were changed to a Resonance® 6Fr metallic stent. The Resonance 6Fr metallic stent had the longest median functional duration of 14 months (p = 0.012).

conclusionResonance® 6Fr metallic stents appear to have a significantly longer functional duration than a new 6Fr polymer stent or 8Fr polymer stent, which may allow patients to enjoy a better quality of life and delay permanent nephrostomy tube insertion.