ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2024
Clinical characteristics of acute acquired concomitant esotropia before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective analysis.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors and predictors for botulinum toxin type A reinjection within six months in patients with acute acquired concomitant esotropia.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Binocular Vision Anomalies in Scotland at Age 3.5-5.5 Years: An Epidemiological Study.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
- Adult-Acquired Esotropia: Clinical Characteristics, Risk Factors and Outcomes of a Novel Surgical Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The COVID-19 pandemic and the abrupt changes in the reported cases of acute acquired comitant esotropia.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to observe the clinical characteristics of acute acquired concomitant esotropia (AACE) patients in recent five years and to examine the changes in the proportion of AACE cases before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsA retrospective study included 148 patients who underwent strabismus correction surgery for AACE between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021. The study analyzed the changing proportion of AACE cases before and after the COVID-19 pandemic and analyzed its clinical characteristics.
resultsAbnormalities in the worth 4 dot examination (both distance and near) were present in 134 cases (90.54%) before surgery, while 140 cases (94.59%) showed normal results after surgery. Near stereoacuity was present in 135 cases (91.22%). The near and distance deviations were (55.01 ± 18.77) PD and (57.30 ± 17.64) PD, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the two (p = 0.279). There were significant differences in the ratio of refractive status among different age groups (p < 0.001), while no statistically significant difference was observed in the ratio of refractive status for near deviation (p = 0.085) or distance deviation (p = 0.116). The proportion of AACE cases after the COVID-19 pandemic was significantly higher than that before the COVID-19 pandemic (p = 0.042). There was no statistically significant difference in the clinical characteristics between the two groups (p > 0.05).
conclusionsMyopia is the most common refractive status in AACE. More than half of patients had occupations that involved long hours of close work. The proportion of AACE cases increased significantly after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38386058What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.