ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Multiple and Optimal Screening Subset: a method selecting global characteristic congeners for robust foodomics analysis.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Metabolomics and foodomics shed light on the molecular processes within living organisms and the complex food composition by leveraging sophisticated analytical techniques to systematically analyze the vast array of molecular features. The traditional feature-picking method often results in arbitrary selections of the model, feature ranking, and cut-off, which may lead to suboptimal results. Thus, a Multiple and Optimal Screening Subset (MOSS) approach was developed in this study to achieve a balance between a minimal number of predictors and high predictive accuracy during statistical model setup. The MOSS approach compares five commonly used models in the context of food matrix analysis, specifically bourbons. These models include Student's t-test, receiver operating characteristic curve, partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), random forests, and support vector machines. The approach employs cross-validation to identify promising subset feature candidates that contribute to food characteristic classification. It then determines the optimal subset size by comparing it to the corresponding top-ranked features. Finally, it selects the optimal feature subset by traversing all possible feature candidate combinations. By utilizing MOSS approach to analyze 1406 mass spectral features from a collection of 122 bourbon samples, we were able to generate a subset of features for bourbon age prediction with 88% accuracy. Additionally, MOSS increased the area under the curve performance of sweetness prediction to 0.898 with only four predictors compared with the top-ranked four features at 0.681 based on the PLS-DA model. Overall, we demonstrated that MOSS provides an efficient and effective approach for selecting optimal features compared with other frequently utilized methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.