Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38385835›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2024

Comparative study on wound healing and infection between open and minimally invasive surgical methods in pediatric otolaryngology surgery.

Xionghui Wu, Weiqing Huang, Sijun Zhao, Min Huang, Yuting Kuang, Guangliang Liu

RetractedOpen access · goldAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xionghui WuDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hunan Children's Hospital, Changsha City, China.
Weiqing HuangDepartment of Neonatology, Hunan Children's Hospital, Changsha City, China.
Sijun ZhaoDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hunan Children's Hospital, Changsha City, China.
Min HuangDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hunan Children's Hospital, Changsha City, China.
Yuting KuangDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hunan Children's Hospital, Changsha City, China.
Guangliang LiuDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hunan Children's Hospital, Changsha City, China.
Hunan Children's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric otolaryngology surgeries are crucial interventions requiring careful consideration of surgical methods to optimize outcomes. The choice between open and minimally invasive surgical approaches in this context warrants thorough investigation. While both methods aim to address ear, nose, and throat conditions in children, a comparative study assessing their impact on crucial factors such as intraoperative parameters, wound healing, complications, and postoperative pain is essential. This study aims to compare the effects of open and minimally invasive surgical methods on wound healing and infection in pediatric otolaryngology surgery, and provide a scientific basis for the selection of surgical methods. Two groups of patients were selected, with 90 people in each group. One group received open surgery and the other received minimally invasive surgery. Recording the intraoperative time, anesthesia time, and intraoperative blood loss; the number of days required for wound healing; the occurrence of wound-related complications; the comparison of pain on postoperative Days 1, 3, and 7; and the factors influencing postoperative wound healing were analyzed. In the minimally invasive surgery group, the intraoperative time was shorter, the anesthesia time was relatively reduced, and the amount of bleeding was significantly reduced. Wounds also take fewer days to heal and have lower rates of wound-related complications. When comparing the pain on 1, 3, and 7 days after surgery, the minimally invasive surgery group had relatively mild pain. Analysis of postoperative wound healing factors showed that minimally invasive surgical methods have a positive impact on healing. In pediatric otolaryngology surgery, minimally invasive surgery performs better than open surgery in terms of intraoperative operation time, anesthesia time, blood loss, wound healing time, complication rate, and postoperative pain. Therefore, minimally invasive surgery may be a safer and more effective surgical method.

Indexed as

OtolaryngologyPharynxChildHumansMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative PainWound Healingminimally invasive surgeryopen surgerypain comparisonpediatric ENT surgerywound healing

Identifiers

PMID38385835
PMCPMC10883252
OpenAlexW4392042168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.