ArticleAcute medicine & surgery
Relationship between extravascular leakage and clinical outcome on computed tomography of isolated traumatic brain injury.
Article in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Relationship between extravascular leakage and clinical outcome on computed tomography of isolated traumatic brain injury.Acute medicine & surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study investigated whether contrast extravasation on computed tomography (CT) angiography in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with death or surgical procedures. Methods: Patients over 18 years old, directly brought in by ambulance with an isolated head injury and confirmed to have acute intracranial hemorrhage on a CT scan upon admission between 2010 and 2020, were included. The primary outcome was mortality, and the secondary outcome was neurosurgical procedures performed from admission to discharge from the intensive care unit. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between these outcomes and contrast extravasation. Results: The analysis included 188 patients with a median age of 65 years, 123 men (65.4%), 34 deaths (18.1%), and 91 surgeries (48.4%). Among the 66 patients with contrast extravasation, 22 (33.3%) died and 47 (71.2%) required surgery. Among the 122 patients with no contrast extravasation, 12 (9.8%) died, and 44 (36.1%) required surgery. The presence or absence of extravascular leakage was associated with death (odds ratio, 3.6 [95% CI: 1.2-12.2]) and surgery (odds ratio, 7.6 [95% CI: 2.5-22.7]). Conclusion: Contrast extravasation was associated with mortality and performance of surgery in patients with an isolated head injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.