ArticleClinical case reports2024
Delayed amyotrophic lateral sclerosis diagnosis with subtle cardiac manifestations: Was anchoring bias contributory?
Article in Clinical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Delayed amyotrophic lateral sclerosis diagnosis with subtle cardiac manifestations: Was anchoring bias contributory?Clinical case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rare, progressive neurodegenerative disease affecting both upper and lower motor neurons. Throughout medical training, it is taught that the most recognizable clinical presentation involves both motor and bulbar changes. Given the complexity of the diagnosis however, it is no surprise that there is significant multisystem involvement secondary to the autonomic dysfunction associated with the disease. The clinical cognitive biases that exist due to prior educational training and patient provided chief complaint can mislead clinicians and prevent a holistic, inclusive approach toward each patient encounter. This can delay diagnosis and increase unnecessary healthcare spending. In a disease with such a poor prognosis, this effect can be catastrophic, resulting in unacceptable medical, functional, and psychosocial outcomes. As clinicians, it is imperative to acknowledge these cognitive biases through introspection, which can improve clinical outcomes and ultimately patient quality of life for those facing this devastating disease. We report a case of a 55-year-old female who presented with a chief complaint of palpitations and minimal slurred speech on multiple encounters, subsequently leading to a focused cardiovascular workup. It was not until after several hospital encounters that a thorough functional and neuromuscular exam was performed, which ultimately helped to broaden the differential and lead to the diagnosis of ALS. Unfortunately, due to this delayed diagnosis, the patient's functionality was beyond repair. Given the underlying cognitive biases that are present in all clinicians, we hypothesize this patient's sex, presenting symptom, and primary chief complaint misled clinicians to perform limited history and physical examinations, therefore, leading to a narrowed differential. If diagnosed in a timely fashion, vital services such as rehabilitation could have provided this patient with the necessary medical, functional, and psychosocial support to face this devastating disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.