Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38384932›Full record

ArticlePulmonary circulation2024

Recognition, diagnosis, and operability assessment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH): A global cross-sectional scientific survey (CLARITY).

Grzegorz Kopeć, Paul Forfia, Kohtaro Abe, Amélie Beaudet, Virginie Gressin, Mitja Jevnikar, Catherina Meijer, Yan Zhi Tan, Olga Moiseeva, Karen Sheares and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pulmonary circulation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pulmonary hypertension aetiologies in different parts of the world.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 13 institutions in 11 countries.

Grzegorz KopećPulmonary Circulation Centre, Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Faculty of Medicine Jagiellonian University Medical College Krakow Poland.
Paul ForfiaTemple University Hospital Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Kohtaro AbeKyushu University Hospital Fukuoka Japan.
Amélie BeaudetActelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd., A Janssen Pharmaceutical Company of Johnson & Johnson Global Market Access Allschwil Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0535-672X
Virginie GressinActelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. A Janssen Pharmaceutical Company of Johnson & Johnson, Global Medical Affairs Allschwil Switzerland.
Mitja JevnikarHôpital de Bicêtre Le Kremlin-Bicêtre France.
Catherina MeijerMonitor Deloitte Zaventem Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8487-3858
Yan Zhi TanMonitor Deloitte Zaventem Belgium.
Olga MoiseevaAlmazov National Medical Research Center St. Petersburg Russia.
Karen ShearesRoyal Papworth Hospital Cambridge UK.
Nika Skoro-SajerMedical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
Mario Terra-FilhoPulmonary Division-Heart Institute (Incor) University of Sao Paulo Sao Paulo Brazil.
Helen WhitfordThe Alfred Hospital Melbourne Australia.
Zhenguo ZhaiState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Health and Multimorbidity, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center of Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases Institute of Respiratory Medicine Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7096-8792
Gustavo A HeresiCleveland Clinic Ohio USA.
Actelion (Switzerland) · CHBicêtre Hospital · FRChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNCleveland Clinic · USFederal Almazov North-West Medical Research Centre · RUJagiellonian University · PLJanssen (Switzerland) · CHKyushu University Hospital · JPMedical University of Vienna · ATPapworth Hospital · GBTemple University Hospital · USThe Alfred Hospital · AUUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early recognition and diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is crucial for improving prognosis and reducing the disease burden. Established clinical practice guidelines describe interventions for the diagnosis and evaluation of CTEPH, yet limited insight remains into clinical practice variation and barriers to care. The CTEPH global cross-sectional scientific survey (CLARITY) was developed to gather insights into the current diagnosis, treatment, and management of CTEPH and to identify unmet medical needs. This paper focuses on the recognition and diagnosis of CTEPH and the referral and evaluation of these patients. The survey was offered to hospital-based medical specialists through Scientific Societies and other medical organizations, from September 2021 to May 2022. Response data from 353 physicians showed that self-reported awareness of CTEPH increased over the past 10 years among 96% of respondents. Clinical practices in acute pulmonary embolism (PE) follow-up and CTEPH diagnosis differed among respondents. While 50% of respondents working in a nonexpert center reported to refer patients to an expert pulmonary hypertension/CTEPH center when CTEPH is suspected, 51% of these physicians did not report referral of patients with a confirmed diagnosis for further evaluation. Up to 50% of respondents involved in the evaluation of referred patients have concluded a different operability status than that indicated by the referring center. This study indicates that early diagnosis and timely treatment of CTEPH is challenged by suboptimal acute PE follow-up and patient referral practices. Nonadherence to guideline recommendations may be impacted by various barriers to care, which were shown to vary by geographical region.

Indexed as

chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertensionclinical practicediagnosispulmonary embolismpulmonary hypertension

Identifiers

PMID38384932
PMCPMC10880430
OpenAlexW4391996379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.