Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38384927›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2024

Community scientist program provides bi-directional communication and co-learning between researchers and community members.

Jessica Alvarado, Larkin L Strong, Birnur Buzcu-Guven, Leonetta B Thompson, Erica Cantu, Chelsea C Carrier, Chiamaka D Chukwu, Cassandra L Harris, Luz K Melendez, Crystal L Roberson and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jessica AlvaradoSchool of Health Professions, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3874-478X
Larkin L StrongDepartment of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Birnur Buzcu-GuvenDepartment of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8502-5033
Leonetta B ThompsonDepartment of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Erica CantuUTHealth Houston School of Public Health Regional Campus at Brownsville, Brownsville, TX, USA.
Chelsea C CarrierDepartment of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Chiamaka D ChukwuDepartment of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Cassandra L HarrisDepartment of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Luz K MelendezUTHealth Houston School of Public Health Regional Campus at Brownsville, Brownsville, TX, USA.
Crystal L RobersonDepartment of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Angela M RossUTHealth Houston McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, Houston, TX, USA.
Sophia C RussellDepartment of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Pablo SanchezUTHealth Houston School of Public Health Regional Campus at Brownsville, Brownsville, TX, USA.
Amirali TahananUTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3866-5932
Blair C ZdenekUTHealth Houston School of Public Health Regional Campus at Brownsville, Brownsville, TX, USA.
Belinda M ReiningerUTHealth Houston School of Public Health Regional Campus at Brownsville, Brownsville, TX, USA.
Lorna H McNeillDepartment of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community involvement in research is key to translating science into practice, and new approaches to engaging community members in research design and implementation are needed. The Community Scientist Program, established at the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston in 2018 and expanded to two other Texas institutions in 2021, provides researchers with rapid feedback from community members on study feasibility and design, cultural appropriateness, participant recruitment, and research implementation. This paper aims to describe the Community Scientist Program and assess Community Scientists' and researchers' satisfaction with the program. We present the analysis of the data collected from 116 Community Scientists and 64 researchers who attended 100 feedback sessions, across three regions of Texas including Northeast Texas, Houston, and Rio Grande Valley between June 2018 and December 2022. Community Scientists stated that the feedback sessions increased their knowledge and changed their perception of research. All researchers (100%) were satisfied with the feedback and reported that it influenced their current and future research methods. Our evaluation demonstrates that the key features of the Community Scientist Program such as follow-up evaluations, effective bi-directional communication, and fair compensation transform how research is conducted and contribute to reducing health disparities.

Indexed as

co-learningCommunity engagementcommunity scientistsTexastranslational researchers

Identifiers

PMID38384927
PMCPMC10879996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.