Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38384916›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2024

A practical guide to adopting Bayesian analyses in clinical research.

Lauren B Gunn-Sandell, Edward J Bedrick, Jacob L Hutchins, Aaron A Berg, Alexander M Kaizer, Nichole E Carlson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lauren B Gunn-SandellDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4673-2114
Edward J BedrickDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ, USA.
Jacob L HutchinsDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Aaron A BergDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Alexander M KaizerDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2334-5514
Nichole E CarlsonDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0679-6663

Funding

Statistical Methods and Adaptive Trial Designs for Cardiovascular Outcomes with Information SharingK01HL151754 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI KAIZER, ALEXANDER MARK · 2021 to 2025
$742k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL151754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bayesian statistical approaches are extensively used in new statistical methods but have not been adopted at the same rate in clinical and translational (C&T) research. The goal of this paper is to accelerate the transition of new methods into practice by improving the C&T researcher's ability to gain confidence in interpreting and implementing Bayesian analyses. Methods: We developed a Bayesian data analysis plan and implemented that plan for a two-arm clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of a new opioid in reducing time to discharge from the post-operative anesthesia unit and nerve block usage in surgery. Through this application, we offer a brief tutorial on Bayesian methods and exhibit how to apply four Bayesian statistical packages from STATA, SAS, and RStan to conduct linear and logistic regression analyses in clinical research. Results: The analysis results in our application were robust to statistical package and consistent across a wide range of prior distributions. STATA was the most approachable package for linear regression but was more limited in the models that could be fitted and easily summarized. SAS and R offered more straightforward documentation and data management for the posteriors. They also offered direct programming of the likelihood making them more easily extendable to complex problems. Conclusion: Bayesian analysis is now accessible to a broad range of data analysts and should be considered in more C&T research analyses. This will allow C&T research teams the ability to adopt and interpret Bayesian methodology in more complex problems where Bayesian approaches are often needed.

Indexed as

clinical trialsR statistical softwareSASSTATATutorial

Identifiers

PMID38384916
PMCPMC10877520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.