Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38384906›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2024

Lessons learned from implementing a diversity, equity, and inclusion curriculum for health research professionals at a large academic research institution.

LaMisha Hill Weller, Anna D Rubinsky, Starley B Shade, Felix Liu, Iona Cheng, Georgina Lopez, Asha Robertson, Jennifer Smith, Kristina Dang, Christian Leiva and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

LaMisha Hill WellerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Anna D RubinskyDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Starley B ShadeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Felix LiuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Iona ChengDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Georgina LopezDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Asha RobertsonDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jennifer SmithDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Kristina DangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Christian LeivaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Susan RubinDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Suzanna M MartinezDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Kirsten Bibbins-DomingoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Meghan D MorrisDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2762-2953
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Despite advances in incorporating diversity and structural competency into medical education curriculum, there is limited curriculum for public health research professionals. We developed and implemented a four-part diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) training series tailored for academic health research professionals to increase foundational knowledge of core diversity concepts and improve skills. Methods: We analyzed close- and open-ended attendee survey data to evaluate within- and between-session changes in DEI knowledge and perceived skills. Results: Over the four sessions, workshop attendance ranged from 45 to 82 attendees from our 250-person academic department and represented a mix of staff (64%), faculty (25%), and trainees (11%). Most identified as female (74%), 28% as a member of an underrepresented racial and ethnic minority (URM) group, and 17% as LGBTQI. During all four sessions, attendees increased their level of DEI knowledge, and within sessions two through four, attendees' perception of DEI skills increased. We observed increased situational DEI awareness as higher proportions of attendees noted disparities in mentoring and opportunities for advancement/promotion. An increase in a perceived lack of DEI in the workplace as a problem was observed; but only statistically significant among URM attendees. Discussion: Developing applied curricula yielded measurable improvements in knowledge and skills for a diverse health research department of faculty, staff, and students. Nesting this training within a more extensive program of departmental activities to improve climate and address systematic exclusion likely contributed to the series' success. Additional research is underway to understand the series' longer-term impact on applying skills for behavior change.

Indexed as

Academic research institutionanti-racismdiversity trainingpublic health

Identifiers

PMID38384906
PMCPMC10879992
OpenAlexW4390814019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.