Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38384818›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2024

Coexistence mechanism of ecological specialists and generalists based on a network dimension reduction method.

Dongli Duan, Jiale Hang, Chengxing Wu, Xue Bai, Yisheng Rong, Gege Hou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dongli DuanSchool of Information and Control Engineering Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology Xi'an China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3920-2326
Jiale HangSchool of Information and Control Engineering Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology Xi'an China.
Chengxing WuSchool of Information and Control Engineering Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology Xi'an China.
Xue BaiSchool of Information and Control Engineering Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology Xi'an China.
Yisheng RongSchool of Economics NorthWest University of Politics and Law Xi'an China.
Gege HouSchool of Mechanical Engineering Northwestern Polytechnical University Xi'an China.
Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology · CNNorthwestern Polytechnical University · CNNorthwest University of Politics and Law · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As an ecological strategy for species coexistence, some species adapt to a wide range of habitats, while others specialize in particular environments. Such 'generalists' and 'specialists' achieve normal ecological balance through a complex network of interactions between species. However, the role of these interactions in maintaining the coexistence of generalist and specialist species has not been elucidated within a general theoretical framework. Here, we analyze the ecological mechanism for the coexistence of specialist and generalist species in a class of mutualistic and competitive interaction ecosystems based on the network dimension reduction method. We find that ecological specialists and generalists can be identified based on the number of their respective interactions. We also find, using real-world empirical network simulations, that the removal of ecological generalists can lead to the collapse of local ecosystems, which is rarely observed with the loss of ecological specialists.

Indexed as

coexistence mechanismcomplex networkdimension reductiondynamical networks

Identifiers

PMID38384818
PMCPMC10880134
OpenAlexW4391997148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.