Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38384808›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Clinical outcomes of atezolizumab versus standard-of-care docetaxel with and without ramucirumab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who received prior immunotherapy.

Shenduo Li, Rami Manochakian, Ruqin Chen, Jaydeepbhai Patel, Jyothik Varun Inampudi, Koshiya R Hiren, Yujie Zhao, Yanyan Lou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shenduo LiDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Rami ManochakianDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Ruqin ChenDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Jaydeepbhai PatelDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Jyothik Varun InampudiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Detroit Medical Center/Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.
Koshiya R HirenDepartment of Medicine, Desert Valley Hospital, Victorville, CA, United States.
Yujie ZhaoDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Yanyan LouDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
WinnMed · USDesert Valley Hospital · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USWayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Atezolizumab is superior to docetaxel for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are pretreated with platinum-based chemotherapy based on the POPLAR and OAK trials. However, patients who received prior immunotherapy were excluded from these trials. The standard of care second-line therapy for these patients remains to be docetaxel with or without ramucirumab. The efficacy and safety of atezolizumab as a subsequent therapy in immunotherapy-pretreated patients are unknown. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who were pretreated with immunotherapy at Mayo Clinic Jacksonville and Rochester from 2016 to 2022. Patients who received subsequent therapy of atezolizumab alone (Atezo), docetaxel (Doce), or docetaxel + ramucirumab (Doce+Ram) were included. Results: In this cohort of 165 patients, 12.7% (n=21), 49.1% (n=81), and 38.2% (n=63) patients received subsequent Atezo, Doce, and Doce+Ram, respectively. 1-year landmark progression-free survival (PFS) were 23.8%, 6.2%, and 3.2% (p=0.006), and 2-year landmark PFS were 14.3%, 0%, and 0% (p<0.0001), in the Atezo, Doce, and Doce+Ram groups, respectively. About 20% patients with positive PD-L1 had durable response to atezolizumab. The Atezo group showed significantly greater overall survival (OS) improvement over Doce group (median OS 17.7 vs. 7.7 months, HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29 - 0.76, p=0.008), and over Doce+Ram group (median OS 17.7 vs. 8.9 months, HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32 - 0.95, p=0.047). 4 of 21 (19%) patients in the Atezo group developed immune-related adverse events (irAE). Conclusion: We observed statistically significant and clinically meaningful overall survival benefits of atezolizumab monotherapy compared with docetaxel +/- ramucirumab in patients with advanced NSCLC who were pretreated with immunotherapy. The survival benefit seems to be mainly from PD-L1 positive patients. Subsequent immunotherapy with Atezolizumab did not increase irAE rate.

Indexed as

atezolizumabdocetaxelimmunotherapyNSCLCPD-1/L1ramucirumab

Identifiers

PMID38384808
PMCPMC10880031
OpenAlexW4391613948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.